首页> 外文期刊>Science >The Case of the Midwife Toad: Fraud or Epigenetics?
【24h】

The Case of the Midwife Toad: Fraud or Epigenetics?

机译:助产士蟾蜍的案例:欺诈还是表观遗传学?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Paul Kammerer has been called the perpetrator of one of the most celebrated scientific frauds of the early 20th century. He has also been defended as the victim of forgery by a lab assistant; some even say he was framed by political or scientific opponents. Now, a new analysis published this week suggests that his infamous experiments may have been the first demonstrations of a recently recognized phenomenon: epigenetics.rnThe story starts in the early 1900s. Kammerer, an Austrian biologist, argued strongly in favor of the Lamarckian view that traits acquired during an organism's lifetime could be passed on to future generations. He claimed to have observed Lamarckian inheritance in various organisms, including salamanders and tunicates, but his most publicized evidence came from the midwife toad, Alytes obstetricans.
机译:保罗·卡默勒(Paul Kammerer)被称为20世纪初期最著名的科学欺诈案的肇事者。他还被一名实验室助手辩护为伪造的受害者;甚至有人说他遭到政治或科学反对者的陷害。现在,本周发表的一项新分析表明,他臭名昭著的实验可能是最近被认可的现象:表观遗传学的首次展示。这个故事始于1900年代初期。奥地利生物学家卡默勒坚决支持拉马克主义的观点,即在生物体一生中获得的特质可以传给子孙后代。他声称已经观察到Lamarckian在各种生物中的遗传,包括tu和被膜,但他最广为人知的证据来自助产士蟾蜍Alytes obstetricans。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science》 |2009年第5945期|1194-1195|共2页
  • 作者

    ELIZABETH PENNISI;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号