...
首页> 外文期刊>Science >Vaccine Maker Wins In High Court
【24h】

Vaccine Maker Wins In High Court

机译:疫苗制造商在高等法院获胜

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The U.S. Supreme Court came down firmly on the side of a vaccine manufacturer last week, ruling 6-2 with one abstention that the parents of a teenager who was apparently seriously injured by a vaccine she was given as a baby aren't entitled to sue the maker, Wyeth. The parents of Hannah Bruesewitz argued that she had received a "scientifically outmoded" DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) vaccine that Wyeth had decided not to update. But Antonin Scalia and five other justices concluded that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which sought to protect manufacturers from excessive liability claims while preserving a family's right to be compensated for vaccine injuries, did not intend for companies to be liable for such so-called design defects.
机译:上周,美国最高法院坚定地支持疫苗生产商,以6比2裁定弃权,认为一名青少年婴儿的父母显然受到婴儿接种疫苗的伤害而无权提起诉讼。制造商,惠氏。汉娜·布鲁塞维茨(Hannah Bruesewitz)的父母辩称,她已收到惠氏决定不更新的“科学过时”的DTP(白喉,破伤风,百日咳)疫苗。但是安东宁·斯卡利亚(Antonin Scalia)和其他五名法官得出结论,1986年的《国家儿童疫苗伤害法》旨在保护制造商免于承担过多的赔偿责任,同时又保留了家庭获得疫苗伤害赔偿的权利,并不打算让公司对此承担责任。所谓的设计缺陷。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science 》 |2011年第6021期| p.1118| 共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号