...
首页> 外文期刊>Science >A U.K. View on the U.S. Attack on Social Sciences
【24h】

A U.K. View on the U.S. Attack on Social Sciences

机译:英国对美国社会科学袭击的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Social science is under attack in the United States. The National Science Foundation (NSF) is prohibited from funding political science, except for grants identified by its director as "promoting national security or the economic interests of the United States." The High Quality Research Act is being drafted with the aim of guarding against "questionable projects" at NSF. A bill was proposed that would exclude health economics research at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Such developments provide cause for concern. First, this represents political interference in the delivery of science. It is unreasonable for scientists to be oblivious to the political reality of budget constraints and responsibility to the taxpayer, particularly in periods of austerity. However, there are good reasons why, in most of the world, decisions about science funding are left to the experts.
机译:在美国,社会科学正受到攻击。国家科学基金会(NSF)被禁止资助政治科学,但其理事确定为“促进国家安全或美国经济利益”的资助除外。目前正在起草《高质量研究法》,以防止NSF出现“可疑项目”。提出了一项法案,其中将不包括美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的卫生经济学研究。这种事态发展令人担忧。首先,这代表了对科学交付的政治干预。科学家忽视预算约束和对纳税人负责的政治现实是不合理的,特别是在紧缩时期。但是,有充分的理由说明为什么在世界大多数地方,有关科学资助的决定留给专家。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science 》 |2013年第6147期| 719-719| 共1页
  • 作者

    Paul Boyle;

  • 作者单位

    U.K. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), Swin- don SN21UJ, UK,Science Europe, Brussels B-1040 Bel- gium;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号