首页> 外文期刊>Science >The Pertussis Paradox
【24h】

The Pertussis Paradox

机译:百日咳悖论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

When California reported more than 9000 cases of whooping cough in 2010, public health alarm bells rang far and wide. A childhood disease vanquished decades ago by a vaccine was resurgent. Major outbreaks of the disease, properly known as pertussis, soon surfaced in several other states, including Minnesota, Washington, and North Carolina. Something was wrong, very wrong.Kathryn Edwards, a vaccinologist at Van-derbilt University in Nashville, and many of her colleagues realized that the safer pertussis vaccines they helped usher in in the 1990s had come at a steep cost: They do not create immune protection as long-lasting as the vaccine they replaced. "It's humbling and kind of depressing," says Edwards, whose own daughter had suffered serious side effects from the old-fashioned vaccine. "I spent so much of my time and my life working on this. ... We were so excited that we had the answer, and now it isn't really the answer."
机译:当加利福尼亚州在2010年报告了9000多例百日咳病例时,公共卫生警报铃响彻四面。几十年前,一种疫苗消灭了一种儿童疾病,这种疾病再次流行。该疾病的主要爆发(通常称为百日咳)很快在其他几个州浮出水面,其中包括明尼苏达州,华盛顿州和北卡罗来纳州。纳什维尔范德比尔特大学的疫苗学家凯瑟琳·爱德华兹(Kathryn Edwards)和她的许多同事意识到,他们在1990年代推出的更安全的百日咳疫苗付出了高昂的代价:它们不产生免疫力保护与他们更换的疫苗一样持久。爱德华兹说:“这令人沮丧,令人沮丧。”爱德华兹的女儿因老式疫苗而遭受了严重的副作用。 “我花了很多时间和精力来解决这个问题。。。我们感到很兴奋,得到了答案,现在,这实际上不是答案。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science》 |2013年第6145期|454-455|共2页
  • 作者

    ARTHUR ALLEN;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:52:58

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号