首页> 外文期刊>Science & Society >The God Debates and the Materialist Interpretation of History
【24h】

The God Debates and the Materialist Interpretation of History

机译:上帝之争与唯物史观

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The recent God debates, constrained by anxieties as to ecological burnout and weapons of mass destruction, brought atheist critics to the top of the best seller list. Examination of these debates in class and ideological terms indicates that: 1) fundamentalism (in the United States) is going downhill; 2) neoconservatives will be seeking alliances with ecumenical (not fundamentalist) believers, while at the same time promoting joint ventures with scientists, whether believers or not; and 3) on both sides of the religious frontier elitists will tend to become political and class collaborators. The 2008 meltdown opens (briefly perhaps) a window of ideological realism. Tragically tardy in entering these debates, the left can best serve bio-survival on earth by reasserting its long-established negation of religion - not as an elitist putdown of stupidity, but as the conclusion necessarily arrived at by an egalitarian, anti-elitist, materialist interpretation of human history, past and forthcoming. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:最近对上帝的辩论,由于对生态枯竭和大规模杀伤性武器的忧虑而受到限制,将无神论者的评论带到了最畅销书的榜首。从阶级和意识形态方面对这些辩论进行考察表明:1)(美国的)原教旨主义正在走下坡路; 2)新保守主义者将寻求与普世的(不是原教旨主义者)信徒结盟,同时促进与科学家(无论信徒与否)的合资。 3)在宗教边界的精英双方都倾向于成为政治和阶级合作者。 2008年的崩溃打开了(简而言之)意识形态现实主义的窗口。在参加这些辩论时,悲惨的迟疑是,左翼可以通过重申其长期以来对宗教的否定来最好地为地球上的生物生存服务-不是作为对愚蠢的精英主义者的压制,而是因为结论必然是由平等,反精英,唯物主义对人类历史的过去和未来的解释。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science & Society》 |2009年第4期|p.474-497|共24页
  • 作者

    Alex Saxton;

  • 作者单位

    ALEX SAXTON** I want to express my thanks for careful readings and comments by Jeanne Giovannoni, Jonathan McLeod, Gary Nash, Robert Rydell, Martha Saxton, Jack Weston, and the anonymous (and very helpful) suggestions of the Science & Society referees.P.O. Box 827Lone Pine, CA 93545alexsaxton@schat.net;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:20:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号