首页> 外文期刊>Science and Public Policy >The political impact of science: is tobacco control science- or policy-driven?
【24h】

The political impact of science: is tobacco control science- or policy-driven?

机译:科学的政治影响:烟草控制是科学驱动还是政策驱动?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Tobacco control is often viewed as a clear example of how scientific knowledge can fundamentally change social norms. This article discusses the relationship between scientific knowledge and public policy on the basis of tobacco control and how its development is interpreted quite differently across disciplines. One literature tends to view the impact of science on politics as being almost automatic even in situations where this has clearly not happened. Another literature focuses on the internal obstacles of the political system to let science impact upon public policy. Unfortunately, this division lets each perspective reduce science and public policy to each other all too easily, which this article aims redeem through the use of a Foucauldian concept of the 'will to knowledge' as well as a discussion of how the case relates to the broader literature on science and public policy.
机译:烟草控制通常被视为科学知识如何从根本上改变社会规范的明确例子。本文讨论了基于烟草控制的科学知识与公共政策之间的关系,以及在各个学科之间如何理解其发展。一部文献倾向于认为科学对政治的影响几乎是自动发生的,即使在这种情况显然没有发生的情况下也是如此。另一本文献关注政治体系的内部障碍,以使科学影响公共政策。不幸的是,这种划分让每个观点都太容易彼此削弱科学和公共政策,本文旨在通过运用福柯式的“知识意志”概念来进行赎回,并讨论案件与法律之间的关系。关于科学和公共政策的广泛文献。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science and Public Policy》 |2008年第10期|p.757-769|共13页
  • 作者

    Larsen Lars Thorup;

  • 作者单位

    Lars Thorup Larsen is a postdoctoral researcher at the Departmentof Political Science, University of Aarhus, 8000 Aarhus C,Denmark. Email: lars@ps.au.dk;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    is tobacco control science- or policy-driven?;

    机译:烟草控制是科学驱动还是政策驱动?;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:43:41

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号