首页> 外文期刊>Science & Technology Libraries >What Should Science Reference Librarians Do with Books Classified as Science That Aren't Science: Revisiting the Well-Known Worlds in Collision by Immanuel Velikovsky as a Case Study
【24h】

What Should Science Reference Librarians Do with Books Classified as Science That Aren't Science: Revisiting the Well-Known Worlds in Collision by Immanuel Velikovsky as a Case Study

机译:科学参考馆员应如何对待被归类为非科学的书籍:以伊曼纽尔·韦利科夫斯基为例重新探讨碰撞中的世界

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Students browsing the science sections in their library may naturally assume that all of the books are scientifically valid and accurate. Science collections may also contain books that may not now be accurate, either because they are out-of-date or never belonged there. While out-of-date knowledge can sometimes be beneficial, invalid books can only mislead. The well-known book Worlds in Collision by Immanuel Velikovsky is a case study on how librarians can handle such books. For these books, an explanatory note can be placed on the book's online catalog entry or even in the book. The book can also be weeded from the collection or reclassi-fied. Each one of these putative treatments has potential advantages and disadvantages.
机译:学生在图书馆中浏览科学部分时,自然会认为所有书籍都是科学有效和准确的。科学馆藏中可能还包含一些现在可能不准确的书籍,这可能是因为它们过时或从不属于那里。虽然过时的知识有时会有所帮助,但无效的书只会误导他人。伊曼纽尔·韦利科夫斯基(Immanuel Velikovsky)着名的著作《碰撞中的世界》(Worlds in Collision)是关于图书馆员如何处理此类书籍的案例研究。对于这些书籍,可以在该书籍的在线目录条目上甚至在该书籍中放置说明性注释。这本书也可以从集合中除草或重新分类。这些推定治疗方法中的每一种都有潜在的优点和缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号