首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament >The Assyrian Evidence: A Reply to Salibi's Questions Regarding Assyrian Sources for their Campaigns in Palestine and the Existence of a Bt umria in Palestine in the Iron II
【24h】

The Assyrian Evidence: A Reply to Salibi's Questions Regarding Assyrian Sources for their Campaigns in Palestine and the Existence of a Bt umria in Palestine in the Iron II

机译:亚述证据:对撒利比关于亚述来源在巴勒斯坦的战役以及铁矿II中巴勒斯坦的Bt umria存在的问题的答复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article forms an independent revised part of an online discussion (2003) between Dr. Kamal Salibi from the American University in Berut and Prof. Dr. Thomas L. Thompson and Dr. Ingrid Hjelm from the University of Copenhagen at the initiative of publisher Dr. Ziad Muna, Cadmus Press, Beirut and Damascus. The discussion ended prematurely and will not be published. The article seeks to answer Dr Salibi's questions regarding the placement of “the Palestinian Iron Age state” that is, “also known as Bit umri.” Did the Assyrians conquer this state in Palestine as is usually agreed, or did they in fact go to Western Arabia, where the Israelites are supposed to have lived at that time. Salibi has in several works argued that Iron Age Israel should be sought in the region of Asir, a stretch about 600 km long and 200 km wide north of Yemen in Western Arabia. Salibi's argument rests on similarity of place names and geographical features that correspond to some material in the Old Testament, especially the Joshua and David stories. Rather than discussing the main arguments in Salibi's thesis, this article seeks to examine a consequence thereof, namely the Assyrian identification and placement of Israel/ Bt-umria in the Iron Age. Which geo-historical circumstances do the Neo-Assyrian texts reflect when they speak about the area? Which route did the Assyrians take for their western campaigns and finally when and where did they traverse the Arabian Peninsula. The examination does not support Salibi's thesis regarding Israel of the Iron Age.
机译:本文构成了Berut的美国大学的Kamal Salibi博士与哥本哈根大学的Thomas L. Thompson博士和Ingrid Hjelm博士在出版商Dr. Ziad Muna,Cadmus Press,贝鲁特和大马士革。讨论过早结束,将不会公开。本文旨在回答萨利比博士关于“巴勒斯坦铁器时代国家”(也称为“ Bit umri”)的位置的问题。亚述人是按照通常的协议征服了巴勒斯坦的这个州的,还是实际上去了当时应该居住以色列人的西部阿拉伯。萨利比(Salibi)在几项著作中提出,应在阿西尔(Asir)地区寻求铁器时代的以色列,该地区长约600公里,宽约200公里,位于阿拉伯西部的也门以北。萨利比的论据基于地名和地理特征的相似性,这些地名和地理特征与旧约中的某些材料相对应,尤其是约书亚和大卫的故事。本文没有讨论撒利比论文中的主要论点,而是试图研究其后果,即在铁器时代,亚述人对以色列/ Bt-umria的认同和地位。当新亚述文本谈到该地区时,它们反映了哪些地理历史环境?亚述人为西部大战采取了哪条路线,最后他们何时何地穿越了阿拉伯半岛。该考试不支持撒利比关于铁器时代以色列的论点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament》 |2009年第1期|7-22|共16页
  • 作者

    Ingrid Hjelm;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Biblical Exegesis, The University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:04:41

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号