...
首页> 外文期刊>SC magazine >TYPICAL FTC ACTION: VALUECLICK CASE
【24h】

TYPICAL FTC ACTION: VALUECLICK CASE

机译:典型的FTC行动:价值点击案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The FTC's recent $2.9 million settlement with ValueClick, an integrated online marketing services firm, offers a good example of the types of data security-related missteps the agency prosecutes. The FTC said that ValueClick and its subsidiaries, Hi-Speed Media and E-Babylon, not only violated federal law with deceptive advertising and emails, but also "failed to secure consumers' sensitive financial information, despite their claims to do so." In addition, the FTC charged the three companies with misrepresenting the security measures they'd put in place to safeguard customers' sensitive financial information. Notably, the FTC said the companies published online privacy policies claiming they encrypted customer information, but either didn't actually encrypt the information at all or used non-standard forms of encryption. Also notable was the FTC's charge that several of the companies' websites were vulnerable to SQL injection attacks, despite the fact that the companies claimed they implemented reasonable security measures.
机译:美国联邦贸易委员会(FTC)最近与一家综合在线营销服务公司ValueClick达成了290万美元的和解协议,很好地说明了该机构起诉的与数据安全相关的失误。 FTC表示,ValueClick及其子公司Hi-Speed Media和E-Babylon不仅以欺骗性的广告和电子邮件违反了联邦法律,而且“尽管声称这样做却未能确保消费者的敏感财务信息”。此外,联邦贸易委员会(FTC)指控这三家公司歪曲了他们为保护客户的敏感财务信息而采取的安全措施。 FTC尤其指出,两家公司发布了在线隐私政策,声称它们对客户信息进行了加密,但实际上根本没有对信息进行加密,或者使用了非标准的加密形式。同样值得注意的是,FTC指控该公司的一些网站容易受到SQL注入攻击,尽管这些公司声称已实施合理的安全措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号