首页> 外文期刊>SAM advanced management journal >Sticky Ethics, Innovation, and Corporate Responsibility
【24h】

Sticky Ethics, Innovation, and Corporate Responsibility

机译:粘性伦理,创新和企业责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

"To assume that any given effort to 'do good' will meet with applause would be naive." Why this is so, and why the development and execution of organizational ethics and corporate responsibility is so complex is examined in this article. The discussion, which draws many research threads together, leans on an integrative model involving values as function, structure, interaction, and cognition. These value sets interact and, in turn, may evolve from individual ideas into institutionalized ethical norms. At the same time, the evolution of corporate (or organizational) responsibility is influenced by already existing "norms." Innovative, entrepreneurial organizations may be less influenced by existing value systems and more by those of key individuals, and the organization itself is typically influx. On the other hand, large, established organizations with substantial resources may have greater ability to buck sticky values and norms if they so wish.
机译:“假设任何为'做善事'而付出的努力都会得到掌声,这是天真的。”为什么会这样,为什么组织道德和公司责任的发展和执行是如此复杂?讨论汇集了许多研究线索,并依赖于涉及功能,结构,相互作用和认知等价值的整合模型。这些价值观相互影响,并可能从个人观念演变为制度化的道德规范。同时,公司(或组织)责任的演变受到已经存在的“规范”的影响。创新型企业家组织可能较少受现有价值体系的影响,而受关键人物的影响更大,并且组织本身通常会大量涌入。另一方面,大型,成熟且拥有大量资源的组织如果愿意的话,可能更有能力打破粘性的价值观和规范。

著录项

  • 来源
    《SAM advanced management journal》 |2015年第3期|212-22|共12页
  • 作者

    David L. Torres;

  • 作者单位

    University of Arizona, Sierra Vista;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:02:16

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号