首页> 外文期刊>Road & Transport Research >Park and Ride: an Adelaide case study
【24h】

Park and Ride: an Adelaide case study

机译:停车与乘车:阿德莱德案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Park and Ride (P&R) schemes have many potential benefits, yet there is evidence that they can lead to an overall increase in private car use as a result of traffic redistribution, additional trip generation, and abstraction of users from the public transport system. This paper reports on research into the recently established Adelaide Entertainment Centre P&R facility situated on the fringe of Adelaide's CBD. The research was conducted a few months after the opening of the P&R facility to capture the travel behaviour changes facilitated by the scheme. The results show little evidence of additional trip generation and a moderate level of car interception: 29.8% of users had previously driven into the CBD but now use a car-mass transit combination. What is disturbing though is the number of people who have shifted away from using public transport for their entire journey to using a car-mass transit combination: 82.3% of respondents who previously used mass transit for their entire journey now travel part of the way by car. The results of a single study need to be treated with caution; however, they do highlight the importance of carefully considering the location of P&R stations and the implications of the changes they enable. This research also highlights the need for more independent research into Australian P&R schemes in order to more clearly understand the specific dynamics of these facilities, and whether this compares with international findings.
机译:停车和乘车(P&R)计划具有许多潜在的好处,但是有证据表明,由于交通的重新分配,增加的出行次数以及用户从公共交通系统的提取,它们可以导致私家车的总体使用增加。本文报道了对位于阿德莱德中央商务区边缘的最近建立的阿德莱德娱乐中心P&R设施的研究报告。这项研究是在P&R设施启用后几个月进行的,目的是捕获该计划带来的出行行为变化。结果表明,几乎没有证据表明会产生额外的出行和中等程度的汽车拦截:29.8%的用户以前曾开车进入中央商务区,但现在使用了汽车与大众运输系统。不过,令人不安的是,从全程使用公共交通工具转为使用汽车与大众运输相结合的人数:以前在整个旅程中使用大众运输的受访者中有82.3%汽车。一项研究的结果应谨慎对待;但是,它们的确强调了仔细考虑P&R站的位置及其启用的更改的意义的重要性。这项研究还强调,需要对澳大利亚的P&R计划进行更独立的研究,以便更清楚地了解这些设施的具体动态,并将其与国际调查结果进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号