...
首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >Scientific Peer Review to Inform Regulatory Decision Making: Leadership Responsibilities and Cautions
【24h】

Scientific Peer Review to Inform Regulatory Decision Making: Leadership Responsibilities and Cautions

机译:科学同行评审,以告知监管决策:领导职责和注意事项

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The article offers insights on the peer-review process as it relates to scientific and technical reports used to inform regulatory decisions. Used effectively, peer review is a powerful tool for advising organizational leaders whether the scientific foundations of their decisions can be expected to withstand scrutiny as rule-making products move through interagency reviews, public comment and stakeholder processes, congressional oversight, and judicial review. The emphasis is "heads up" rather than "how to." That is, without delving into myriad technical and administrative details, the discussion highlights nine fundamental "leadership responsibilities" that determine the nature and course of peer review.
机译:本文提供了有关同行评审过程的见解,因为它与用于为监管决策提供依据的科学和技术报告有关。有效使用的同行评审是一种功能强大的工具,可为组织领导者提供建议,以确保在制定规则的产品通过机构间评审,公众意见和利益相关方流程,国会监督和司法审查时,是否可以期望其决策的科学基础可以经受审查。重点是“注意”而不是“如何”。也就是说,在没有深入研究技术和行政细节的情况下,讨论重点介绍了确定同行评审的性质和过程的九项基本“领导职责”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号