...
首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >Discussion of 'Conundrums with Uncertainty Factors'
【24h】

Discussion of 'Conundrums with Uncertainty Factors'

机译:讨论“不确定因素难题”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I have some quibbles with the details of Cooke's analysis and proposals, but strongly endorse his call for a reevaluation of use of uncertainty factors. Any innovation must respect the requirements and con-rnstraints of the risk assessment context and his proposal for a probability-based, random chemical approach is right on the mark. Improved BBDRMs are a prerequisite, but obtaining the information and understanding to support them is very challenging, indeed daunting, possibly in "Alice in Wonderland" territory. Whatever progress can be made will be beneficial and I thank Roger for raising the issues and energizing both debate and research.
机译:我对库克的分析和建议的细节有些疑问,但强烈支持他要求重新评估不确定性因素使用的呼吁。任何创新都必须尊重风险评估环境的要求和约束,他提出的基于概率的随机化学方法的建议是正确的。改进的BBDRM是先决条件,但是获得信息和理解以支持它们非常困难,甚至令人生畏,甚至可能在“爱丽丝梦游仙境”地区。无论取得什么进展都将是有益的,我感谢罗杰提出的问题并激发了辩论和研究的热情。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Risk analysis》 |2010年第3期|346-348|共3页
  • 作者

    Thomas A. Louis;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, E3527, Baltimore, MD 21205-2179, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号