首页> 外文期刊>Restoration ecology >Effects of Stream Restoration on Woody Riparian Vegetation of Southern Appalachian Mountain Streams, North Carolina, U.S.A
【24h】

Effects of Stream Restoration on Woody Riparian Vegetation of Southern Appalachian Mountain Streams, North Carolina, U.S.A

机译:溪流恢复对美国北卡罗来纳州南部阿巴拉契亚山区溪流木质河岸植被的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Riparian revegetation, such as planting woody seedlings or live stakes, is a nearly ubiquitous component of stream restoration projects in the United States. Though evaluations of restoration success usually focus on in-stream ecosystems, in order to understand the full impacts of restoration the effects on riparian ecosystems themselves must be considered. We examined the effects of stream restoration revegetation measures on riparian ecosystems of headwater mountain streams in forested watersheds by comparing riparian vegetation structure and composition at reference, restored, and degraded sites on nine streams. According to mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA), there was a significant effect of site treatment on riparian species richness, basal area, and canopy cover, but no effect on stem density. Vegetation characteristics at restored sites differed from those of reference sites according to all metrics (i.e. basal area, canopy cover, and species composition) except species richness and stem density. Restored and degraded sites were structurally similar, with some overlap in species composition. Restored sites were dominated by Salix sericea and Cornus amo-mum (species commonly planted for revegetation) and a suite of disturbance-adapted species also dominant at degraded sites. Differences between reference and restored sites might be due to the young age of restored sites (average 4 years since restoration), to reassembly of degraded site species composition at restored sites, or to the creation of a novel anthropogenic ecosystem on these headwater streams. Additional research is needed to determine if this anthropogenic riparian community type persists as a resilient novel ecosystem and provides valued riparian functions.
机译:在美国,河岸植被恢复,例如种植木本苗或活木桩,几乎是无处不在的部分。尽管对恢复成功的评估通常集中在河流生态系统,但是为了理解恢复的全部影响,必须考虑对河岸生态系统本身的影响。通过比较参考流域,恢复流域和退化流域的河岸植被结构和成分,我们比较了森林流域上游流域河岸生态系统的流域恢复植被措施对九个河流的影响。根据方差的混合模型分析(ANOVA),现场处理对河岸物种的丰富度,基础面积和树冠覆盖率有显着影响,但对茎密度没有影响。除了物种丰富度和茎密度以外,根据所有指标(即基础面积,冠层覆盖和物种组成),恢复地点的植被特征与参考地点的植被特征不同。恢复和降解的部位在结构上相似,物种组成上有些重叠。恢复的地点以柳柳和山茱a(通常种植用于植被恢复的物种)为主,一套适应干扰的物种也占退化地点的优势。参考站点和恢复站点之间的差异可能是由于恢复站点的年龄年轻(恢复以来平均为4年),恢复站点上退化站点物种组成的重新组合,或者是在这些源头水流上创建了新的人为生态系统。需要更多的研究来确定这种人为的河岸社区类型是否可以作为有韧性的新型生态系统持续存在并提供有价值的河岸功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号