首页> 外文期刊>Research in transportation economics >Total cost of ownership, social lifecycle cost and energy consumption of various automotive technologies in Italy
【24h】

Total cost of ownership, social lifecycle cost and energy consumption of various automotive technologies in Italy

机译:意大利各种汽车技术的总拥有成本,社会生命周期成本和能源消耗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper estimates the total cost of ownership, social lifecycle cost and energy consumption of 66 cars with different fuel/powertrains available in Italy in 2013. The aim is to provide the various private and public decision makers with information that could allow them to better understand the current market penetration of the various automotive technologies and to predict the future one. It is found that the car operated by conventional fuels (gasoline, diesel) is currently the least expensive as far as the total costs of ownership are concerned. The bi-fuel liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and the bi-fuel compressed natural gas (CNG) internal combustion engine vehicles are in the same price range. Both the battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and, especially, the hybrid ICEVs are more expensive. On the contrary, the social lifecycle costs of the BEVs are the lowest, thanks not only to their zero air pollutants' emissions in the use phase but also to their reduced noise emissions. The amount of the social costs relative to the total cost of ownership, estimated using recent European parameters, represents at the most 6% of the total cost. Consequently, even if the external costs were internalized, the alternative fuel vehicles would not become convenient for the final consumer from a monetary point of view. Considering the energy consumption, with the 2011 Italian energy production mix, the BEVs and the diesel hybrid are the most energy efficient cars. Focusing on 7 specific models, and simulating realistic scenarios, it is found that the relative ranking of the BEVs in terms of total costs improves moderately when the traveled distance increases, subsidies are introduced and battery price drops. However, the BEVs become convenient only when the annual distance traveled is at least 20,000 km, a value much higher than the current Italian average and posing serious issues in terms of vehicles' range. Only ajoint reduction of the battery price to €240/kWh from initial estimated cost of €412/kWh and the introduction of a subsidy would make the BEVs competitive with the current average Italian annual distance traveled.
机译:本文估算了2013年意大利有66辆具有不同燃料/动力总成的汽车的总拥有成本,社会生命周期成本和能源消耗。目标是向各种私人和公共决策者提供信息,使他们能够更好地了解当前各种汽车技术的市场渗透率并预测未来的一种。已经发现,就总拥有成本而言,使用常规燃料(汽油,柴油)运行的汽车目前最便宜。双燃料液化石油气(LPG)和双燃料压缩天然气(CNG)内燃机车的价格范围相同。电池电动汽车(BEV),尤其是混合动力ICEV都更昂贵。相反,BEV的社会生命周期成本最低,这不仅是由于其使用阶段的零空气污染物排放,而且还因为它们减少了噪音排放。使用最近的欧洲参数估算的相对于总拥有成本的社会成本金额最多占总成本的6%。因此,即使将外部成本内部化,从金钱的角度来看,代用燃料车辆也不会为最终消费者带来便利。考虑到能源消耗,在2011年意大利能源生产结构中,BEV和柴油混合动力车是最节能的汽车。着眼于7个特定模型并模拟实际情况,发现当行驶距离增加,引入补贴和电池价格下降时,BEV在总成本方面的相对排名会适度提高。但是,只有当每年行驶的距离至少为20,000公里时,BEV才变得方便,该值远高于意大利目前的平均水平,并且在车辆行驶距离方面造成了严重问题。只有将电池价格从最初的估计成本412欧元/千瓦时共同降低到240欧元/千瓦时,再加上补贴,才可以使BEV在当前意大利平均年行驶距离上具有竞争力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号