首页> 外文期刊>Research in Science Education >Learning in First-Year Biology: Approaches of Distance and On-Campus Students
【24h】

Learning in First-Year Biology: Approaches of Distance and On-Campus Students

机译:一年级生物学学习:远程和校园内学生的学习方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper aims to extend previous research into learning of tertiary biology, by exploring the learning approaches adopted by two groups of students studying the same first-year biology topic in either on-campus or off-campus “distance” modes. The research involved 302 participants, who responded to a topic-specific version of the Study Process Questionnaire, and in-depth interviews with 16 of these students. Several quantitative analytic techniques, including cluster analysis and Rasch differential item functioning analysis, showed that the younger, on-campus cohort made less use of deep approaches, and more use of surface approaches than the older, off-campus group. At a finer scale, clusters of students within these categories demonstrated different patterns of learning approach. Students’ descriptions of their learning approaches at interview provided richer complementary descriptions of the approach they took to their study in the topic, showing how deep and surface approaches were manifested in the study context. These findings are critically analysed in terms of recent literature questioning the applicability of learning approaches theory in mass education, and their implications for teaching and research in undergraduate biology.
机译:本文旨在通过探索两组学生在校内或校外“距离”模式下研究同一年级生物学主题的学习方法,将先前的研究扩展到第三级生物学的学习。这项研究涉及302名参与者,他们对特定主题的学习过程问卷进行了回答,并对其中16名学生进行了深度访谈。包括聚类分析和Rasch差异项功能分析在内的几种定量分析技术表明,与年长的校外组相比,年轻的校内队列较少使用深层方法,而更多地使用表面方法。在更好的规模上,这些类别的学生群体展示了不同的学习方法模式。学生在面试中对自己学习方法的描述,为他们在本主题中采用的学习方法提供了更为丰富的补充描述,显示了在学习环境中深度和表面学习方法的体现。根据最近的文献对这些研究结果进行了批判性分析,这些文献质疑学习方法论在大众教育中的适用性,以及它们对本科生物学教学和研究的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号