首页> 外文期刊>Research in Science Education >Science Teachers’ Views on CoRes and PaP-eRs as a Framework for Articulating and Developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge
【24h】

Science Teachers’ Views on CoRes and PaP-eRs as a Framework for Articulating and Developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge

机译:理科教师对CoRes和PaP-eRs的看法,以阐明和发展教学内容知识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper reports on a study which was designed to examine how CoRes (Content Representations) and PaP-eRs (Pedagogical and Professional-experience Repertoires) might impact the practice of science teachers by considering how they might value (or not) pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) as part of their professional knowledge. The paper is based on a 2 year longitudinal study that used CoRes and PaP-eRs as a form of intervention with a group of teachers (n = 6) to determine how they interpreted, used and developed their understanding of PCK over time. The study concluded that the participating teachers developed rich understandings of their professional knowledge of science teaching and were of the view that CoRes and PaP-eRs were significant in shaping that development. As a consequence, the study also validates the use of CoRes and PaP-eRs as a meaningful methodology for examining science teachers’ PCK.
机译:本文报告了一项旨在研究CoRes(内容表示)和PaP-eRs(教学和专业经验参考手册)如何影响科学教师实践的研究,方法是考虑他们如何评价(或不评价)教学内容知识( PCK)作为其专业知识的一部分。本文基于一项为期两年的纵向研究,该研究使用CoRes和PaP-eRs作为对一组教师(n = 6)的干预形式,以确定他们随着时间的推移如何解释,使用和发展他们对PCK的理解。研究得出的结论是,与会的教师对他们的科学教学专业知识有了丰富的理解,并认为CoRes和PaP-eRs对塑造这种发展具有重要意义。因此,该研究还验证了CoRes和PaP-eRs作为检查理科教师PCK的有意义方法的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号