首页> 外文期刊>Research in Science Education >Epistemic Beliefs and Conceptual Understanding in Biotechnology: A Case Study
【24h】

Epistemic Beliefs and Conceptual Understanding in Biotechnology: A Case Study

机译:认知信念和生物技术中的概念理解:一个案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this investigation was to explore students’ epistemic beliefs and conceptual understanding of biotechnology. Epistemic beliefs can influence reasoning, how individuals evaluate information, and informed decision making abilities. These skills are important for an informed citizenry that will participate in debates regarding areas in science such as biotechnology. We report on an in-depth case study analysis of three undergraduate, non-science majors in a biotechnology course designed for non-biochemistry majors. We selected participants who performed above average and below average on the first in-class exam. Data from multiple sources—interviews, exams, and a concept instrument—were used to construct (a) individual profiles and (b) a cross-case analysis of our participants’ conceptual development and epistemic beliefs from two different theoretical perspectives—Women’s Ways of Knowing and the Reflective Judgment Model. Two independent trained researchers coded all case records independently for both theoretical perspectives, with resultant initial Cohen’s kappa values above .715 (substantial agreement), and then reached consensus on the codes. Results indicate that a student with more sophisticated epistemology demonstrated greater conceptual understandings at the end of the course than a student with less sophisticated epistemology, even though the latter performed higher initially. Also a student with a less sophisticated epistemology and low initial conceptual performance does not demonstrate gains in their overall conceptual understanding. Results suggest the need for instructional interventions fostering epistemological development of learners in order to facilitate their conceptual growth.
机译:这项调查的目的是探索学生的认知信念和对生物技术的概念理解。认知信念会影响推理,个人如何评估信息以及明智的决策能力。这些技能对于知识渊博的公民至关重要,他们将参加有关生物技术等科学领域的辩论。我们报告了针对非生物化学专业的生物技术课程中三个本科非科学专业的深入案例研究分析。我们选择了在第一次课堂考试中表现高于平均水平和低于平均水平的参与者。来自面试,考试和概念工具等多种来源的数据被用来构建(a)个人概况,以及(b)从两种不同的理论视角对参与者的概念发展和认知信念进行跨案例分析。知识与反思性判断模型。两名经过训练有素的研究人员从两种理论角度对所有案例记录进行了独立编码,最终Cohen的kappa初始kappa值超过.715(基本一致),然后在编码上达成了共识。结果表明,与认识论较差的学生相比,认识论较复杂的学生在课程结束时表现出了更高的概念理解力,尽管后者起初表现更高。同样,认识论不够成熟,初始概念表现低下的学生也不会表现出整体概念上的理解。结果表明,需要采取教学干预措施来促进学习者的认识论发展,以促进他们的概念成长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号