首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Missions-oriented RD&D institutions in energy between 2000 and 2010: A comparative analysis of China, the United Kingdom, and the United States
【24h】

Missions-oriented RD&D institutions in energy between 2000 and 2010: A comparative analysis of China, the United Kingdom, and the United States

机译:2000年至2010年期间以任务为导向的RD&D机构:对中国,英国和美国的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the first decade of the 21st century, governments in many countries around the world expanded or redesigned their support for the development and deployment of advanced energy-supply and energy-demand technologies. By analyzing the institutions that have been created to stimulate energy technology innovation in the United States, the United Kingdom, and China-three countries with very different sizes, political systems and cultures, natural resources, and histories of involvement in the energy sector-this paper highlights how variations in national objectives and industrial and political environments have translated into variations in policy. The analysis shows that the countries' activities differ in terms of three general elements: whether the government's various activities are coordinated or autonomous, whether the business community is significantly involved in the design and running of the initiatives, and whether the implementing institutions focus on single or multiple missions and innovation types. These differences constitute different types of governments' attempts to activate the state-industry innovation complex. The paper concludes with a discussion of the trade-offs involved in the design of systems for public support of energy RD&D, points to possible gaps in the government approaches to support energy RD&D, and highlights areas of future research.
机译:在21世纪的前十年中,世界上许多国家的政府都扩大或重新设计了对先进能源供应和能源需求技术的开发和部署的支持。通过分析在美国,英国和中国这三个刺激能源技术创新的机构,这三个国家的规模,政治制度和文化,自然资源以及参与能源部门的历史截然不同。该论文强调了国家目标,工业和政治环境的变化如何转化为政策的变化。分析表明,各国的活动在三个基本方面有所不同:政府的各项活动是协调的还是自治的;企业界是否大量参与了倡议的设计和运行;执行机构是否集中于单一的倡议?或多种任务和创新类型。这些差异构成了不同类型的政府为激活国家产业创新综合体所做的尝试。本文最后讨论了为能源RD&D提供公共支持的系统的设计中的取舍,指出了政府在支持能源RD&D的方法上可能存在的差距,并着重指出了未来研究的领域。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Research policy》 |2012年第10期|1742-1756|共15页
  • 作者

    Laura Diaz Anadon;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    energy innovation; RD; institutions; United States; China; United Kingdom;

    机译:能源创新;研发;机构;美国;中国;英国;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:54:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号