首页> 外文期刊>Requirements Engineering >Empirical research in requirements engineering: trends and opportunities
【24h】

Empirical research in requirements engineering: trends and opportunities

机译:需求工程中的实证研究:趋势和机遇

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

AbstractRequirements engineering (RE) being a foundation of software development has gained a great recognition in the recent era of prevailing software industry. A number of journals and conferences have published a great amount of RE research in terms of various tools, techniques, methods, and frameworks, with a variety of processes applicable in different software development domains. The plethora of empirical RE research needs to be synthesized to identify trends and future research directions. To represent a state-of-the-art of requirements engineering, along with various trends and opportunities of empirical RE research, we conducted a systematic mapping study to synthesize the empirical work done in RE. We used four major databases IEEE, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink and ACM and Identified 270 primary studies till the year 2012. An analysis of the data extracted from primary studies shows that the empirical research work in RE is on the increase since the year 2000. The requirements elicitation with 22 % of the total studies, requirements analysis with 19 % and RE process with 17 % are the major focus areas of empirical RE research. Non-functional requirements were found to be the most researched emerging area. The empirical work in the sub-area of requirements validation and verification is little and has a decreasing trend. The majority of the studies (50 %) used a case study research method followed by experiments (28 %), whereas the experience reports are few (6 %). A common trend in almost all RE sub-areas is about proposing new interventions. The leading intervention types are guidelines, techniques and processes. The interest in RE empirical research is on the rise as whole. However, requirements validation and verification area, despite its recognized importance, lacks empirical research at present. Furthermore, requirements evolution and privacy requirements also have little empirical research. These RE sub-areas need the attention of researchers for more empirical research. At present, the focus of empirical RE research is more about proposing new interventions. In future, there is a need to replicate existing studies as well to evaluate the RE interventions in more real contexts and scenarios. The practitioners’ involvement in RE empirical research needs to be increased so that they share their experiences of using different RE interventions and also inform us about the current requirements-related challenges and issues that they face in their work.
机译: Abstract 作为软件开发基础的需求工程(RE)已获得广泛认可在当前盛行的软件行业时代。在各种工具,技术,方法和框架方面,许多期刊和会议已经发布了大量的可再生能源研究,其可适用于不同软件开发领域的各种过程。需要综合过多的经验性RE研究来确定趋势和未来研究方向。为了代表最先进的需求工程,以及经验式RE研究的各种趋势和机会,我们进行了系统的制图研究,以综合在RE中完成的经验性工作。我们使用了四个主要数据库IEEE,ScienceDirect,SpringerLink和ACM并确定了截至2012年的270项主要研究。对从主要研究中提取的数据的分析表明,自2000年以来,可再生能源的实证研究工作正在增加。占全部研究的22%的启发式,占19%的需求分析和占17%的RE过程是经验RE研究的主要重点领域。非功能性需求被发现是研究最多的新兴领域。需求确认和验证子领域中的经验工作很少,并且呈下降趋势。大多数研究(50%)使用了案例研究方法,随后是实验(28%),而经验报告很少(6%)。几乎所有可再生能源子领域的共同趋势是提出新的干预措施。主要的干预类型是指南,技术和过程。整体上,人们对RE实证研究的兴趣正在上升。然而,尽管需求确认和验证领域很重要,但目前尚缺乏实证研究。此外,需求演化和隐私需求也很少有经验研究。这些可再生能源子区域需要研究人员关注以进行更多的实证研究。目前,经验性RE研究的重点更多是提出新的干预措施。将来,有必要复制现有研究,并在更真实的环境和情况下评估可再生能源干预措施。需要增加从业人员对可再生能源实证研究的参与,以便他们分享使用不同可再生能源干预措施的经验,并向我们介绍当前与需求相关的挑战和工作中面临的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号