首页> 外文期刊>Representation >BALLOT STRUCTURE, DISTRICT MAGNITUDE AND CONSTITUENCY-ORIENTATION OF MPs IN PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION AND MAJORITY ELECTORAL SYSTEMS
【24h】

BALLOT STRUCTURE, DISTRICT MAGNITUDE AND CONSTITUENCY-ORIENTATION OF MPs IN PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION AND MAJORITY ELECTORAL SYSTEMS

机译:比例代表和多数选举系统中议员的选票结构,地区规模和宪法取向

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many studies have been devoted to the way electoral institutions shape the representative process in general, and of the relation between legislators and their local constituency. Yet, the majority of these have been hardly comparative. And when they compared countries, these countries rarely differed in many aspects of the electoral system. This article takes a different perspective by looking at the effect of the electoral formula, district magnitude and ballot structure on how important the constituency is for MPs in three countries that differ on these three components of the electoral system: Belgium, France and Portugal. And the results, though they should be confirmed by analyses on more countries, provide interesting insights. In particular they show that the difference in nature between single and multi-member districts is more important for constituency-orientation than differences between multi-member districts. Second, the article shows that the effect of electoral institutions is not straightforward: its impact is stronger on attitudes towards the constituency than on actaul behaviours of legislators regarding their constituency.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2012.720880
机译:许多研究致力于选举机构总体上塑造代表程序的方式,以及立法者与其当地选区之间的关系。但是,其中大多数几乎没有可比性。当他们比较国家时,这些国家在选举制度的许多方面几乎没有不同。本文通过考察选举方式,地区规模和投票结构对这三个选区在选举制度的这三个组成部分上有所不同的三个国家的议员对议员的重要程度,以不同的观点。尽管这些结果应通过对更多国家的分析加以证实,但仍可提供有趣的见解。特别是,它们表明,单一成员区和多成员区之间的自然差异对于选民取向比多成员区之间的差异更为重要。其次,该文章表明选举机构的作用并不直接:其对选区态度的影响要强于立法者就其选区的实际行为。查看全文下载全文”,services_compact:“ citeulike,网络振动,微博,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2012.720880

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号