首页> 外文期刊>Reliability Engineering & System Safety >A simple reliability block diagram method for safety integrity verification
【24h】

A simple reliability block diagram method for safety integrity verification

机译:一种用于安全完整性验证的简单可靠性框图方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IEC 61508 requires safety integrity verification for safety related systems to be a necessary procedure in safety life cycle. PFD_(avg) must be calculated to verify the safety integrity level (SIL). Since IEC 61508-6 does not give detailed explanations of the definitions and PFD_(avg) calculations for its examples, it is difficult for common reliability or safety engineers to understand when they use the standard as guidance in practice. A method using reliability block diagram is investigated in this study in order to provide a clear and feasible way of PFD_(avg) calculation and help those who take IEC 61508-6 as their guidance. The method finds mean down times (MDTs) of both channel and voted group first and then PFD_(avg). The calculated results of various voted groups are compared with those in IEC61508 part 6 and Ref. [Zhang T, Long W, Sato Y. Availability of systems with self-diagnostic components-applying Markov model to IEC 61508-6. Reliab Eng System Saf 2003;80(2):133-41]. An interesting outcome can be realized from the comparison. Furthermore, although differences in MDT of voted groups exist between IEC 61508-6 and this paper, PFD_(avg) of voted groups are comparatively close. With detailed description, the method of RBD presented can be applied to the quantitative SIL verification, showing a similarity of the method in IEC 61508-6.
机译:IEC 61508要求安全相关系统的安全完整性验证是安全生命周期中的必要步骤。必须计算PFD_(avg)以验证安全完整性等级(SIL)。由于IEC 61508-6并未对其示例给出定义和PFD_(avg)计算的详细说明,因此普通的可靠性或安全工程师很难理解他们在实践中使用该标准作为指导。在这项研究中,研究了一种使用可靠性框图的方法,以提供一种清晰可行的PFD_(avg)计算方法,并帮助以IEC 61508-6为指导的人们。该方法首先找到通道和投票组的平均停机时间(MDT),然后查找PFD_(avg)。将各种投票组的计算结果与IEC61508第6部分和参考文献中的结果进行比较。 [Zhang T,Long W,SatoY。具有自诊断组件的系统的可用性-将Markov模型应用于IEC 61508-6。 Reliab Eng System Saf 2003; 80(2):133-41]。通过比较可以得出有趣的结果。此外,尽管IEC 61508-6与本文之间在表决组的MDT中存在差异,但表决组的PFD_(avg)相对接近。通过详细描述,可以将提出的RBD方法应用于定量SIL验证,这显示了IEC 61508-6中方法的相似性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号