首页> 外文期刊>Reference reviews >The Ashgate Research Companion to Anthropology
【24h】

The Ashgate Research Companion to Anthropology

机译:阿什盖特人类学研究同伴

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

When I reviewed the Concise Dictionary of Social and Cultural Anthropology (Morris, 2012) (RR 2013/010), I noted that Reference Reviews had reviewed innumerable anthropological reference sources over the years. The most recent I had looked at before then was the Routledge Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology (Barnard and Spencer, 2010) (RR 2011/067). We have examined dictionaries, such as The Sage Dictionary of Cultural Studies (Barker, 2005) (RR 2005/022); encyclopedias, such as Folklore: An Encyclopedia of Beliefs, Customs, Tales, Music and Art (McCormick and White, 2011) (RR 2011/360); and biographical reference books, such as the Biographical Dictionary of Anthropology (Amit, 2004) (RR 2004/240). There have been lots of books on research methods, for example, Key Concepts in Social Research Methods (Gomm, 2009) (RR 2009/362) and reference tools to particular aspects of anthropology, such as A Companion to Psychological Anthropology (Casey and Edgerton, 2005) (RR 2005/235). We have also examined a fair number of relevant websites, such as AnthroSource.net (American Anthropological Association, 2016) (RR 2006/130), Anthropological Index Online (Royal Anthropological Institute, 2016) (RR 2006/012) or the now discontinued Anthropology Biography Web (RR 2004/069). Practically every issue of Reference Reviews contains reviews of social science reference tools that are potentially useful for anthropologists. It might seem, therefore, that any library with a need for anthropological information has had ample opportunity to stock up already. Ashgate Publishers obviously feel that there is still a gap in the market and have commissioned this sturdy handbook to fill it.
机译:当我审阅《社会文化人类学简明词典》(Morris,2012年)(RR 2013/010)时,我注意到参考审阅多年来已经审阅了无数人类学参考资料。在此之前,我查看过的最新文章是《社会与文化人类学Routledge百科全书》(Barnard和Spencer,2010年)(RR 2011/067)。我们研究了一些字典,例如《文化研究的贤者词典》(Barker,2005年)(RR 2005/022);百科全书,例如《民俗学:信仰,风俗,故事,音乐和艺术百科全书》(麦考密克和怀特,2011年)(RR 2011/360);以及传记参考书,例如《人类学传记词典》(Amit,2004年)(RR 2004/240)。关于研究方法的书籍很多,例如社会研究方法的关键概念(Gomm,2009)(RR 2009/362)以及人类学特定方面的参考工具,例如《心理人类学同伴》(Casey和Edgerton)。 (2005)(RR 2005/235)。我们还研究了很多相关网站,例如AnthroSource.net(美国人类学协会,2016)(RR 2006/130),在线人类学索引(皇家人类学研究所,2016)(RR 2006/012)或现已停产的网站人类学传记网站(RR 2004/069)。几乎每期《参考评论》都包含社会科学参考工具的评论,这些评论工具可能对人类学家有用。因此,似乎任何需要人类学信息的图书馆都有足够的机会进行盘点。 Ashgate出版商显然认为市场仍然存在缺口,因此已经委托这本坚固的手册来填补它。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Reference reviews》 |2016年第2期|13-14|共2页
  • 作者

    Martin Guha;

  • 作者单位

    Maudsley Philosophy Group, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Anthropology;

    机译:人类学;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:22:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号