首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >El Castillo (Cantabria, northern Iberia) and the Transitional Aurignacian: Using radiocarbon dating to assess site taphonomy
【24h】

El Castillo (Cantabria, northern Iberia) and the Transitional Aurignacian: Using radiocarbon dating to assess site taphonomy

机译:埃尔卡斯蒂略(伊比利亚北部坎塔布里亚)和过渡奥里尼亚克人:使用放射性碳测年法评估现场的塔塔性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The majority of archaeological remains found at El Castillo in northern Iberia were excavated between 1910 and 1914 by Hugo Obermaier. Since the 1980s El Castillo has been studied through a detailed analysis of Obermaier's original excavation notes, the cleaning and study of the extant section, and the excavation of material in the shelter entrance. Radiocarbon dating of charcoal from the modern (1980s onwards) excavation suggested that unit 18, corresponding to Aurignacian Delta of the 1910s excavation, was significantly earlier than other Aurignacian assemblages in western Europe. Combined with a reanalysis of the lithic and osseous industry, these dates led to the suggestion that material in unit 18 and Aurignacian Delta was a transitional industry, showing a gradual transformation of the Mousterian into the Upper Palaeolithic. The conclusion has profound implications for understanding the appearance of the Upper Palaeolithic in western Europe. However, the theory has been heavily debated, with criticism focusing on the analysis of the lithic and bone assemblage as well as the chronology. We focus on the latter, and assess whether the original dates were accurate, whether they were well associated with the archaeology, and whether there was vertical and lateral variation in the age of the assemblages within unit 18 and Aurignacian Delta. New radiocarbon dates on humanly modified bone suggest that in the new area of excavation, unit 18 is found to be earlier than 42 cal kBP, with no evidence of material of a younger age. In contrast, in the old excavation area, Aurignacian Delta does include material of a younger age. This suggests that discussion of the Transitional Aurignacian can only include material from unit 18, in the new area of excavation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.
机译:1910年至1914年之间,雨果·奥伯迈尔(Hugo Obermaier)在伊比利亚北部的El Castillo发现了大部分考古遗迹。自1980年代以来,一直通过对Obermaier的原始挖掘记录进行详细分析,对现存部分进行清洁和研究以及对掩体入口处的材料进行挖掘来研究El Castillo。现代(1980年代以后)发掘中木炭的放射性碳年代测定表明,对应于1910年代发掘的奥里尼亚克三角洲的第18单元明显早于西欧的其他奥里尼亚克组合。结合对石器质和骨质工业的重新分析,这些日期提出了这样的建议,即第18单元和奥里尼亚克三角洲的材料是过渡性工业,表明穆斯特人逐渐转变为上古石器时代。该结论对理解西欧上古旧石器时代的外观具有深远的意义。但是,该理论已引起了激烈的争论,批评的重点是对石质和骨骼组合以及年代的分析。我们将重点放在后者上,并评估原始日期是否准确,它们是否与考古相关联以及18号单元和奥里尼亚克三角洲内组合年龄的垂直和横向变化。经过人工修饰的骨骼上的新放射性碳年代表明,在新的挖掘区域中,发现第18单元早于42 cal kBP,没有证据表明该物质年龄较小。相反,在旧的挖掘区域中,奥里尼亚克三角洲确实包含了年龄较小的物质。这表明,在新的开挖区域中,关于过渡性奥里尼亚克人的讨论只能包括第18单元的资料。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd和INQUA。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号