首页> 外文期刊>The quarterly review of economics and finance >To follow or not to follow - An empirical analysis of the returns of actors on social trading platforms
【24h】

To follow or not to follow - An empirical analysis of the returns of actors on social trading platforms

机译:遵循还是不遵循-社会交易平台上参与者的回报的实证分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We analyze the returns of traders, i.e. signal providers, on social trading platforms and of investors following these traders by utilizing differently sophisticated investment strategies. It becomes evident that simply investing in those traders with the highest accumulated returns leads to high losses, while taking the Sharpe ratio into account improves the achieved returns. Positive returns, however, are only possible for sophisticated strategies that consider information on the risk of the signal providers’ portfolios. Moreover, no strategy reveals a positive abnormal return after transaction costs in the sense of a Carhart four-factor model. Further, we analyze predictors of the weekly returns of the signal providers in a panel set-up. We find that highly active trading behavior is negatively related with the returns, while there is no wisdom-of-the-crowd effect, in the sense of a positive relationship of the number of followers or invested capital with the returns.
机译:我们通过使用不同的复杂投资策略来分析交易者(即信号提供者)在社交交易平台上的回报以及跟随这些交易者的投资者的回报。显而易见的是,简单地投资那些具有最高累计收益的交易者会导致高额损失,而将夏普比率考虑在内会提高所获得的收益。但是,只有考虑到有关信号提供者产品组合风险的信息的复杂策略,才有可能获得正回报。此外,就Carhart四因素模型而言,没有任何策略能够显示出交易成本后的正数异常收益。此外,我们在面板设置中分析信号提供者每周收益的预测指标。我们发现,高度活跃的交易行为与收益呈负相关,而从追随者数量或投资资本与收益之间呈正相关关系的意义上,则没有群众智慧效应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号