首页> 外文期刊>Quality and Quantity >Measuring the Incidence of Over- and Undereducation
【24h】

Measuring the Incidence of Over- and Undereducation

机译:衡量教育过度和教育不足的发生率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We deploy the unique opportunity of a dataset of Flemish school leavers to measure the incidence of over- and undereducation on the basis of the six applied measures in the literature. The incidence of overeducation in the first job after leaving school ranges from only 8% to 51%, undereducation ranges from 3% to 21%. While 66% is overeducated on the basis of at least one measure, only 3% is overeducated on the basis of every measure. Mismatch correlations range from 5% to 82%. Also the categories in terms of gender, educational level and region of residence with the highest likelihood of being overeducated depend on the measure. These findings clearly underline the weakness of the literature on this subject. However, measuring overeducation in different ways enables to derive some alternative concepts. Genuine overeducation amounts to about 20%. The incidence of over- and undereducation is both attributed to qualification inflation and deflation, and a credential gap. Finally, about 80% of the incidence of overeducation is classified as being structural.
机译:我们根据文献中的六种适用措施,利用佛拉芒离校生数据集的独特机会来衡量教育过度和教育不足的发生率。离开学校后第一份工作的过度教育发生率仅为8%至51%,教育不足的发生率则为3%至21%。尽管至少有一项措施对66%的人群进行了过度教育,但根据每项措施,只有3%的人群的教育程度过高。不匹配的相关性范围为5%至82%。另外,性别,受教育程度和居住地区的类别,受过高等教育的可能性最高,也取决于该措施。这些发现清楚地说明了有关该主题的文献的弱点。但是,以不同的方式衡量过度教育可以得出一些替代概念。真正的过度教育约占20%。过度教育和教育不足的原因均归因于资格膨胀和通缩,以及证书差距。最后,大约80%的教育过度发生是结构性的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号