首页> 外文期刊>Quality in Higher Education >Quality of higher education: organisational or educational? A content analysis of Chinese university self-evaluation reports
【24h】

Quality of higher education: organisational or educational? A content analysis of Chinese university self-evaluation reports

机译:高等教育质量:组织还是教育?中国大学自我评价报告的内容分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Based on a study of Chinese university self-evaluation reports, this paper argues that higher education institutions are trying to manage the tensions between educational and organisational quality and the increasing and worldwide concerns about quality assurance. After 30 years of dramatic educational reform, China has established a nationwide evaluation system for assessing its higher education institutions. This comprehensive system includes a series of procedures for both internal self-evaluation and external peer reviewing, among which self-evaluation reports prepared by each institution remain an important basis for external review. In an attempt to examine the institutional understanding of quality in higher education, the authors conducted a content analysis study of 53 self-evaluation reports written by a wide range of higher education institutions in China. This study concludes that the self-evaluation reports have a greater tendency to demonstrate their organisational quality to the external world than reflecting on the internal teaching and learning quality.View full textDownload full textKeywordsquality assurance, higher education institution evaluation, organisational quality, educational quality, China, self-evaluation reportsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2012.708247
机译:基于对中国大学自我评估报告的研究,本文认为,高等教育机构正在努力应对教育和组织质量与日益增长的全球范围内对质量保证的关注之间的紧张关系。经过30年的重大教育改革,中国建立了一个全国性的评估体系来评估其高等教育机构。这个全面的系统包括内部自我评估和外部同行评审的一系列程序,其中每个机构编写的自我评估报告仍然是外部评审的重要基础。为了检验对高等教育质量的制度性理解,作者对中国范围广泛的高等教育机构撰写的53份自我评估报告进行了内容分析研究。这项研究得出的结论是,自我评价报告比向内部教学和学习质量进行反思的趋势更倾向于向外部世界展示其组织质量。查看全文下载全文关键字质量保证,高等教育机构评价,组织质量,教育质量,中国,自我评估报告相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid:“ ra- 4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2012.708247

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号