首页> 外文期刊>Quality Control, Transactions >Replication of Studies in Empirical Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping Study, From 2013 to 2018
【24h】

Replication of Studies in Empirical Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping Study, From 2013 to 2018

机译:经验软件工程研究的复制:系统映射研究,2013年至2018年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Context : In any discipline, replications of empirical studies are necessary to consolidate the acquired knowledge. In Software Engineering, replications have been reported since the 1990s, although their number is still small. The difficulty in publishing, the lack of guidelines, and the unavailability of replication packages are pointed out by the community as some of the main causes. Objective: Understanding the current state of replications in Software Engineering studies by evaluating current trends and evolution during the last 6 years. Method: A Systematic Mapping Study including articles published in the 2013fi2018 period that report at least one replication of an empirical study in Software Engineering. Results: 137 studies were selected and analysed, identifying: i) forums; ii) authors, co-authorships and institutions; iii) most cited studies; iv) research topics addressed; v) empirical methods used; vi) temporal distribution of publications; and vii) distribution of studies according to research topics and empirical methods. Conclusions: According to our results, the most relevant forums are the Empirical Software Engineering and Information and Software Technology journals, and the Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement conference. We observed that, as in previous reviews by other researchers, most of the studies were carried out by European institutions, especially Italian, Spanish, and German researchers and institutions. The studies attracting more citations were published mainly in journals and in the International Conference on Software Engineering. Testing, requirements, and software construction were the most frequent topics of replication studies, whereas the usual empirical method was the controlled experiment. On the other hand, we identified research gaps in areas such as software engineering process, software configuration management, and software engineering economics. When analysed together with previous reviews, there is a clear increasing trend in the number of published replications in the 2013-2018 period.
机译:背景:在任何学科中,有必要对经验研究的复制巩固所获得的知识。在软件工程中,自20世纪90年代以来已经报告了复制,虽然他们的数字仍然很小。作为一些主要原因,社区指出了出版,缺乏指导方针和复制包的不可用的困难。目的:了解软件工程研究中的当前复制状态,通过在过去的6年期间评估当前的趋势和演变。方法:系统映射研究,包括在2013FI2018期间发布的文章,报告了软件工程中的实证研究的至少一个复制。结果:选择并分析了137项研究,识别:i)论坛; ii)作者,共同作者和机构; iii)最引用的研究; iv)研究主题; v)使用的经验方法; VI)出版物的时间分布;和VII)根据研究主题和实证方法分布研究。结论:根据我们的结果,最相关的论坛是经验的软件工程和信息和软件技术期刊,以及经验的软件工程和测量会议。我们观察到,与其他研究人员以来的评论一样,大多数研究由欧洲机构,特别是意大利,西班牙语和德国研究人员和机构进行。吸引更多引用的研究主要出版了期刊和国际软件工程国际会议。测试,要求和软件建设是复制研究中最常见的主题,而通常的经验方法是受控实验。另一方面,我们确定了软件工程过程,软件配置管理和软件工程经济等领域的研究差距。在与以前的评论中分析时,2013 - 2018年期间发表的复制数量明显增加了趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号