首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >A sociohistorical examination of George Herbert Mead's approach to science education
【24h】

A sociohistorical examination of George Herbert Mead's approach to science education

机译:乔治·赫伯特·米德(George Herbert Mead)的科学教育方法的社会历史考察

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although George Herbert Mead is widely known for his social psychological work, his views on science education also represent a significant, yet sometimes overlooked contribution. In a speech delivered in March 1906 entitled "The Teaching of Science in College," Mead calls for cultural courses on the sciences, such as sociology of science or history of science courses, to increase the relevancy of natural and physical science courses for high school and university students. These views reflect Mead's perspective on a number of traditional dualisms, including objectivity versus subjectivity and the social sciences versus natural and physical sciences. Taking a sociohistorical outlook, I identify the context behind Mead's approach to science education, which includes three major influences: (1) German intellectual thought and the Methodenstreit debate, (2) pragmatism and Darwin's theory of evolution, and (3) social reform efforts in Chicago and the General Science Movement.
机译:尽管乔治·赫伯特·米德(George Herbert Mead)的社会心理学工作广为人知,但他对科学教育的看法也代表了重要但有时被忽视的贡献。在1906年3月发表的题为“大学的科学教学”的演讲中,米德呼吁在科学方面开设文化课程,例如科学社会学或科学史课程,以提高高中自然科学和物理科学课程的相关性和大学生。这些观点反映了米德对许多传统二元论的看法,包括客观性与主观性以及社会科学与自然科学和自然科学。从社会历史的角度来看,我确定了米德科学教育方法的背景,其中包括三个主要影响因素:(1)德国知识分子思想和Methodenstreit辩论;(2)实用主义和达尔文的进化论;(3)社会改革的努力在芝加哥和普通科学运动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号