首页> 外文期刊>Psychoanalytic Dialogues >Who's Responsible? Our Mutual Implication in Each Other's Suffering
【24h】

Who's Responsible? Our Mutual Implication in Each Other's Suffering

机译:谁负责?我们在彼此痛苦中的相互牵连

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, I examine the social and psychological roots of what I call neoliberal subjectivity, a version of contemporary subjectivity marked by a repudiation of vulnerability that has arisen from the social, economic, and political milieu of the past 30 years. The defense mechanisms involved in such a repudiation cause a decline in empathic capacities and in the capacity to experience ourselves as responsible and accountable for the suffering of others. I look at the way conflicts in the area of accountability and responsibility are lived both within our patients and within the interaction between patient and analyst. I argue that contemporary definitions of empathy normalize the repudiation of vulnerability and thereby foster an experience of empathy in which one can sustain a safe distance from the suffering other and not hold oneself accountable. A two-way version of empathy that counters neoliberal trends requires that we examine the ways we seek refuge in identifications that distance us from vulnerability, and it requires us to recognize the harm we inflict when we do so.
机译:在本文中,我研究了所谓的新自由主义主观性的社会和心理根源,这是当代主观性的一种形式,其特征是对过去30年的社会,经济和政治环境产生的脆弱性的排斥。参与这种抵赖的防御机制会导致移情能力下降,使自己无法对他人的痛苦负责和承担责任的能力下降。我研究了问责制和责任制之间的冲突在我们的患者内部以及在患者与分析人员之间的互动中存在的方式。我认为,当代对移情的定义使对脆弱性的排斥成为常态,从而培养了移情的体验,即一个人可以与受苦的人保持安全距离,而不对自己负责。应对新自由主义趋势的共鸣有两种方式,要求我们研究寻求避难所的方式,以使我们远离脆弱性,并且要求我们认识到这样做所造成的伤害。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Psychoanalytic Dialogues》 |2009年第2期|105-120|共16页
  • 作者

    Lynne Layton;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard Medical School and the Massachusetts Institute for Psychoanalysis,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:51:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号