首页> 外文期刊>Psychoanalytic Dialogues >One or Many? Commentary on Paper by Debra Rothschild
【24h】

One or Many? Commentary on Paper by Debra Rothschild

机译:一个或多个?黛布拉·罗斯柴尔德(Debra Rothschild)在纸上的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This discussion of Rothschild's case history of a multiple personality disorder (MPD) treatment situates the issue of integration versus multiple self states in terms of cultural values, psychoanalytic theory, and transference-countertransference experience of MPD patients and therapists. Views from autobiographies of multiple personalities are included, and some questions are raised about the relationship of “parts” to traumatic experience: When, and for whom, is integration a treatment goal? When is dissociation a characterological defense, and when do the parts each hold separate traumatic knowledge? How does this question bear on treatment—what gets integrated, the knowledge or the parts? Are termination and integration simultaneous? A recommendation is offered for a wider, more complex view of narrative and historicity in the understanding of narrative reconstruction. A concrete focus on veridicality can be a defense against the overwhelming nature of traumatic experience. A final view is offered which positions the author as more distant from integration as a goal than is Rothschild.
机译:罗斯柴尔德(Rothschild)的一种多人格障碍(MPD)治疗病史的讨论从文化价值,心理分析理论以及MPD患者和治疗师的移交逆转经验的角度出发,解决了整合与多种自我状态的问题。包括来自多种性格的自传的观点,并提出了有关“部位”与创伤经历之间关系的一些问题:整合治疗的目标是何时,针对谁?分离在什么时候是特征防御,什么时候每个部分都拥有独立的创伤知识?这个问题如何影响治疗-整合了什么,知识或组成部分?终止和集成是否同时进行?建议在理解叙事重构时,对叙事和历史性有更广泛,更复杂的认识。注重真实性可以抵御创伤经历的压倒性。提供了最终观点,该观点使作者比罗斯柴尔德更远离融合这一目标。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Psychoanalytic Dialogues》 |2009年第2期|188-196|共9页
  • 作者

    Elizabeth Hegeman;

  • 作者单位

    John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:51:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号