首页> 外文期刊>Psychoanalytic Dialogues >The Achilles Heel of Psychoanalysis: Meditations on Motivation: Commentary on Paper by Robert P. Drozek
【24h】

The Achilles Heel of Psychoanalysis: Meditations on Motivation: Commentary on Paper by Robert P. Drozek

机译:心理分析的致命弱点:动机的沉思:Robert P. Drozek在纸上的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In discussing Robert P. Drozek's “Intersubjectivity Theory and the Dilemma of Intersubjective Motivation,” I consider the challenges inherent to general theories of motivation in contemporary psychoanalysis, challenges that are further complicated by our multiple theories of intersubjectivity. While I agree with Drozek that individuals can be motivated by aspects of others' subjective experience I would not raise this phenomenon to a general theory of motivation. I explain why I feel that motivation is a fraught topic in contemporary psychoanalysis, and I suggest reasons that relational authors have often addressed this topic only obliquely. I also take issue with Drozek's claim that, to date, psychoanalysis has no motivational theory that addresses both the intrapsychic and the intersubjective realms. In reviewing the ideas of several authors whose theories Drozek rejects because he believes their work reduces motivation to the intrapsychic, I find that these authors have addressed the intersubjective and intrapsychic aspects of motivation far more adequately and complexly than Drozek has recognized. Thus while I admire the energy and logic—even at times the eloquence—with which Drozek presents his ideas, I question whether psychoanalysis needs a new motivational theory at this point in time.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2010.514829
机译:在讨论罗伯特·P·德罗泽克的“主体间性理论和主体间动机的困境”时,我考虑了当代心理分析中一般动机理论固有的挑战,这些挑战由于我们多种主体间性理论而变得更加复杂。我同意Drozek的观点,即个体可以受他人主观经验的激励,但我不会将这种现象提升为一般的激励理论。我解释了为什么我觉得动机是当代精神分析中一个充满争议的话题,并且我提出了关系作者经常只倾斜地解决这个话题的原因。我也对Drozek的观点持怀疑态度,因为Drozek的观点是,迄今为止,心理分析还没有针对心理内部和主体间领域的动机理论。在复习了Drozek拒绝其理论的几位作者的观点后,他认为他们的工作减少了对内心心理的动机,我发现这些作者对动机的主体间和内心方面的论述比Drozek所认识的更为充分和复杂。因此,尽管我很欣赏Drozek提出他的想法所需要的精力和逻辑,甚至有时甚至是雄辩的口才,但我仍然怀疑精神分析在这个时候是否需要一种新的动机理论。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand: “泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2010.514829

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号