首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Palliative Care >What indicators are measured by tools designed to address palliative care competence among `generalist' palliative care providers? A critical literature review
【24h】

What indicators are measured by tools designed to address palliative care competence among `generalist' palliative care providers? A critical literature review

机译:旨在解决“专科医生”姑息治疗提供者之间姑息治疗能力的工具可衡量哪些指标?批判文学评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: There is growing evidence that generalists may lack skills and knowledge in palliative carenprovision. This has led to consideration of what the core competencies for palliative care provision amongngeneralists should be.nAim: The objective of this review was to present the best available evidence related to indicators ofncompetence in palliative care provision.nMethod: A systematic review of both qualitative and quantitative literature was undertaken. Medline, Medlinenin Progress, PubMed and CINAHL databases with additional hand searches of Journal of Palliative Care,nPalliative Medicine, and the International Journal of Palliative Nursing were undertaken for the periodn1990–2010. Hawker et al.’s checklist was utilized to select and assess data.nResults: Nineteen of the 1361 articles met the inclusion criteria. The reviewed articles suggest a number ofnindicators of palliative care competence including: medical knowledge/skills, perceptions of knowledgeskills, confidence in palliative care skills, attitudes/opinions towards palliative care, and experience innpalliative care delivery. None of the reviewed research provided definitive evidence as to which indicatorsnbest reflect competency to practice.nConclusion: Multiple approaches, combined in a strategy of triangulation, must be incorporated in anynappraisal in order to successfully measure palliative care competence.
机译:背景:越来越多的证据表明,通才医生可能在姑息性预防方面缺乏技能和知识。目的:本次审查的目的是提供与姑息治疗提供能力指标相关的最佳可用证据。n方法:对定性和定性的系统评价进行了定量文献研究。在1990年至2010年期间,对Medline,Medlinenin Progress,PubMed和CINAHL数据库进行了手动搜索,其中包括《姑息治疗杂志》,《 nPalliative医学》和《国际姑息护理杂志》。结果:在1361篇文章中有19篇符合纳入标准。审阅的文章提出了许多姑息治疗能力指标,包括:医学知识/技能,对知识/技能的认知,对姑息治疗技能的信心,对姑息治疗的态度/看法以及体验姑息治疗的能力。审查的研究均未提供哪项指标最能反映实践能力的明确证据。结论:必须将多种方法结合三角测量策略,才能成功评估姑息治疗能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号