首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Nuclear Energy >Safety performance comparation of MOX, nitride and metallic fuel based 25-100 MWe Pb-Bi cooled long life fast reactors without on-site refuelling
【24h】

Safety performance comparation of MOX, nitride and metallic fuel based 25-100 MWe Pb-Bi cooled long life fast reactors without on-site refuelling

机译:基于MOX,氮化物和金属燃料的25-100 MWe Pb-Bi冷却长寿命快堆没有现场加油的安全性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper the safety performance of 25-100 MWe Pb-Bi cooled long life fast reactors based on three types of fuels: MOX, nitride and metal is compared and discussed. In the fourth generation NPP paradigm, especially for Pb-Bi cooled fast reactors, inherent safety capability is necessary against some standard accidents such as unprotected loss of flow (LJLOF), unprotected rod run-out transient over power (UTOP), unprotected loss of heat sink (ULOHS). Selection of fuel type will have important impact on the overall system safety performance. The results of safety analysis of long life Pb-Bi cooled fast reactors without on-site fuelling using nitride, MOX and metal fuel have been performed. The reactors show the inherent safety pattern with enough safety margins during ULOF and UTOP accidents. For MOX fuelled reactors, ULOF accident is more severe than UTOP accident while for nitride fuelled cores UTOP accident may push power much higher than that comparable MOX fuelled cores.
机译:本文对25-100 MWe Pb-Bi冷却长寿命快堆中基于三种燃料:MOX,氮化物和金属的安全性能进行了比较和讨论。在第四代NPP范式中,尤其是对于Pb-Bi冷却快堆,对于某些标准事故(例如,无保护的流量损失(LJLOF),无保护的杆跳动瞬时功率(UTOP),无保护的功率损失),固有的安全能力是必不可少的散热器(ULOHS)。燃料类型的选择将对整个系统的安全性能产生重要影响。进行了不使用氮化物,MOX和金属燃料进行现场加油的长寿命Pb-Bi冷却快堆的安全性分析结果。在ULOF和UTOP事故期间,反应堆显示出固有的安全模式并具有足够的安全裕度。对于MOX燃料反应堆,ULOF事故比UTOP事故严重,而对于氮化物燃料堆芯,UTOP事故可能会比同等的MOX燃料堆芯推高功率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号