首页> 外文期刊>IT professional >Should flat-rate Internet pricing continue
【24h】

Should flat-rate Internet pricing continue

机译:统一价格的互联网价格应该继续吗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The history of communication technologies: snail mail, telegraph, and telephone, shows a consistent pattern. Quality rises, prices decrease, usage increases, total revenues go up, and pricing structures get simpler. So far, the Internet is following this pattern. It treats all packets equally, and pricing has been mostly through flat monthly or yearly rates that depend only on the size of access links. But there is strong momentum to base Internet pricing on usage and to introduce multiple service levels. The author argues that although flat rate continues to be the predominant form of selling Internet access, flat rate pricing encourages waste and requires the 20 percent of users who account for 80 percent of the traffic to be subsidized by other users and other forms of revenue. Furthermore, flat rate pricing is incompatible with quality-differentiated services.
机译:通信技术的历史:蜗牛邮件,电报和电话,显示出一致的模式。质量提高,价格下降,使用量增加,总收入增加,定价结构变得更简单。到目前为止,互联网正在遵循这种模式。它平等地对待所有数据包,并且定价主要是通过仅取决于接入链路大小的固定月费或年费。但是有很大的动力将互联网定价基于使用情况并引入多种服务级别。作者认为,尽管统一费率仍然是销售互联网接入的主要方式,但统一费率定价鼓励浪费,并要求占80%流量的20%的用户由其他用户和其他形式的收入补贴。此外,统一费率定价与区分质量的服务不兼容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号