...
首页> 外文期刊>Process safety progress >Two Safety Reviews before Formal PHAs
【24h】

Two Safety Reviews before Formal PHAs

机译:正式PHA之前的两次安全审核

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Many companies do not formally begin to address process safety for new processes until a detailed design is available for study—this can lead to hazards being overlooked until the formal PHA is performed.At that stage it may be difficult to make fundamental process changes.Even when companies do conduct process safety reviews during the earlier phases of a project,they often lack formalized and documented methodologies.This article describes two safety reviews that should be conducted earlier in the design process: (a) conceptual stage hazard review and (b) preliminary hazard analysis.These reviews will identify and document important safety features such as (a) inherent safety concepts,(b) major accident hazards,and (c) safeguards.These efforts lighten the workload on the formal PHA team,because the major hazards have already been identified and protected against.
机译:许多公司直到有详细的设计可供研究时才开始正式针对新过程解决过程安全问题,因为这可能导致危险,直到正式的PHA得以执行之前才被忽略。在那个阶段,可能难以进行根本的过程更改。当公司在项目的早期阶段进行过程安全性审查时,它们通常缺乏形式化和文件化的方法。本文介绍了应在设计过程中较早进行的两项安全性审查:(a)概念性阶段危害审查和(b)初步危害分析。这些审查将确定并记录重要的安全特征,例如(a)固有安全概念,(b)重大事故危害和(c)保障措施。由于这些重大危害,这些工作减轻了正式PHA团队的工作量已经被发现并受到保护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号