首页> 外文期刊>Process safety progress >Barriers to Adopting Inherently Safer Design Philosophy in Iran
【24h】

Barriers to Adopting Inherently Safer Design Philosophy in Iran

机译:在伊朗采用本质上更安全的设计理念的障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Inherently safer design (ISD) is the best option to design of safer, cheaper, healthier, and more economic process plants, although this situation of its implementation in the real cases is not satisfying as it should he. This study aimed at explore the barriers influencing adopting ISD philosophy in Iran as a developing country with high potential development in process industries. In this qualitative study, a total of 47 experts-process designers and process safety engineers working in the oil, gas, petrochemical, and chemical manufacturing industries of Iran-participated, and data were gathered through a semiconstructed interview. Data analysis was conducted using the deductive content analysis method. Five categories and 21 subcategories were identified as barriers to the adoption of ISD in Iran, including organization-related barriers (eight factors), inherent-safety-related barriers (three factors), legal- and regulation-related harriers (four factors), technology-related barriers (three factors), and academic-related harriers (three factors). This study revealed that there are several burners to the adoption of ISD philosophy in Iran, and negligence to address these haniers can negatively affect such adoption.
机译:本质上更安全的设计(ISD)是设计更安全,更便宜,更健康,更经济的过程工厂的最佳选择,尽管在实际情况下实施这种情况并不能令人满意。这项研究旨在探讨在伊朗作为过程工业具有高度发展潜力的发展中国家中,影响采用ISD理念的障碍。在这项定性研究中,共有47位在伊朗的石油,天然气,石化和化学制造行业工作的过程设计专家和过程安全工程师参与其中,并通过半结构化访谈收集了数据。使用演绎内容分析方法进行数据分析。确定了五个类别和21个子类别是伊朗采用ISD的障碍,包括与组织有关的障碍(八个因素),与固有安全有关的障碍(三个因素),与法律和法规有关的障碍(四个因素),与技术相关的障碍(三个因素)和与学术相关的障碍(三个因素)。这项研究表明,在伊朗,采用ISD哲学的方式有很多燃烧器,而疏忽解决这些问题的做法可能会对这种采用产生负面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号