...
【24h】

Analyze It!

机译:分析一下!

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My position in eda affords the unique privilege of sitting on the fence, so to speak, between design and fabrication, and I spend a fair amount of time with both groups. I have noticed an interesting disconnect in beliefs when it comes to what must be done in order to validate a design (or set of Gerber files), and who is responsible for doing it. I say disconnect because, from fabricators come complaints that designers don't do enough to validate their layouts for manufactura-bility prior to submitting the job for fabrication. And I hear designers insist all they need to do is "view" the Gerbers to ensure they look OK before sending them for fabrication; the shop can take care of the rest. "When each side points a finger in the other's direction, what's the right way to approach this disconnect? Both sides should perform equal levels of analysis in order to validate a given design, each from their own perspective.
机译:可以说,我在eda的职位享有坐在围栏上的独特特权,可以说在设计和制造之间,而且我和这两个小组都花了大量的时间。我已经注意到,关于验证设计(或Gerber文件集)必须执行的工作以及由谁负责的想法之间的一种有趣的脱节。我之所以说是断断续续的,是因为有制造商抱怨说,设计师在提交制造工作之前没有做足够的工作来验证其可制造性的布局。而且我听说设计师坚持认为,他们所要做的就是“观察” Gerber,以确保在送去制造之前看起来不错。商店可以照顾其余的人。 “当双方将手指指向对方的方向时,解决这种脱节的正确方法是什么?双方应进行相同水平的分析,以便从各自的角度验证给定的设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号