首页> 外文期刊>Power Engineering >Bolstering Coal-Fired Plant Economics
【24h】

Bolstering Coal-Fired Plant Economics

机译:加强燃煤电厂经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The economics of power generation with fossil fuels, in particular the viability of U.S. coal-fired plants, are profoundly affected by factors such as capital cost, operation and maintenance cost, fuel price, labor cost, and especially the present and potential future regulations governing control of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The emissions of carbon dioxide-the GHG of primary concern-for four basic power-generation technologies are as follows: (1) coal-fired supercritical (heat rate of 8,700 Btu/kWh), 1.7; (2) coal-fired ultra-supercritical (heat rate of 7,800 Btu/ kWh), 1.6; (3) conventional natural gas combined cycle, 0.8; and (4) integrated gasification combined cycle, 1.7 As shown, natural gas-fired combined cycle, at 0.8 pounds, produces about half the CO_2 emissions for coal-fired units, whether supercritical or ultra-supercritical. The natural gas technology has attendant economic advantages over coal-fired units under almost all scenarios for GHG emission control.
机译:化石燃料发电的经济性,尤其是美国燃煤电厂的生存能力,受到诸如资本成本,运营和维护成本,燃料价格,人工成本,尤其是当前和未来监管法规的影响。控制温室气体(GHG)排放。四种基本发电技术的主要二氧化碳排放量如下:(1)燃煤超临界(热速率为8,700 Btu / kWh),为1.7; (2)燃煤超超临界(发热量7800 Btu / kWh),1.6; (3)常规天然气联合循环,0.8; (4)整体气化联合循环1.7,如图所示,天然气组合循环为0.8磅,无论是超临界还是超超临界的燃煤机组,其二氧化碳排放量约占一半。在几乎所有温室气体排放控制方案中,天然气技术都具有比燃煤机组更高的经济优势。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Power Engineering》 |2014年第10期|8-8|共1页
  • 作者

    NAT SEKHAR;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:24:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号