首页> 外文期刊>Policy sciences >'Opening up' policy to reflexive appraisal: a role for Q Methodology? A case study of fire management in Cape York, Australia
【24h】

'Opening up' policy to reflexive appraisal: a role for Q Methodology? A case study of fire management in Cape York, Australia

机译:“开放”政策进行反思性评估:Q方法论的作用?澳大利亚约克角消防管理案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recent decades have witnessed increasing attention in theory and practice to participatory approaches to policy appraisal, in part due to the potential of such approaches to facilitate reflexive policy appraisal. It has been observed, however, that in practice these approaches are often as prone as traditional, non-participatory appraisal techniques to being limited in the extent to which that can achieve refiexivity e.g. due to the influence of interests and power and problems of representation. This article explores the extent to which Q Methodology, or 'Q', can play a role in 'opening up' (Stirling Science, Technology & Human Values, 33, 262-294, 2008) policy to reflexive appraisal. A Q study of fire management discourses in Cape York, northern Australia is presented which exposes the existence of four key discourses in the region: discourse A-rational fire management; discourse B-fire-free conservation; discourse C-pragmatic, locally controlled burning; and discourse D-indigenous controlled land management. At present only discourses A and C are reflected in policy. Appraising existing policy on the basis of the different constructions articulated by discourses B and D of the purpose of and practices involved in fire management, is successful in opening up existing policy to reflexive appraisal. In the face of considerable scientific uncertainty as to the ecological impacts of different burning regimes in northern Australia, this process of opening up has important potential for appraising the social desirability of existing policy and practice in the region. This analysis provides a practical demonstration of the wider potential of Q Methodology in opening up other important contemporary policy issues to reflexive appraisal. It also provides the basis for recommending the expansion of participatory processes for facilitating stakeholder engagement in fire management policy and practice in Cape York.
机译:近几十年来,在理论和实践中越来越多地关注参与性政策评估方法,部分原因是这种方法有可能促进反思性政策评估。然而,已经观察到,在实践中,这些方法通常与传统的非参与式评估技术一样容易受到限制,例如,可以实现反射性的程度受到限制。由于利益和权力的影响以及代表问题。本文探讨了Q方法论或“ Q”在反省性评估的“开放”(斯特林科学,技术与人类价值观,33,262-294,2008)政策中的作用程度。本文对澳大利亚北部约克角的消防管理话语进行了一项Q研究,揭示了该地区存在四个关键话语:话语A-理性消防管理;话语B-无火保护;话语C务实,局部控制燃烧;以及话语D本土控制的土地管理。目前,政策只反映了话语A和C。根据关于消防管理的目的和实践的论述B和D所阐述的不同结构来评估现有政策,这可以成功地开放现有政策以进行反思性评估。面对澳大利亚北部不同燃烧制度对生态的巨大科学不确定性,这种开放过程具有评估该地区现有政策和实践的社会可取性的重要潜力。该分析提供了实践方法,证明了Q方法论在开放其他重要的当代政策问题进行反思性评估方面的广阔潜力。它还为建议扩展参与性流程提供了基础,以促进利益相关方参与约克角的消防管理政策和实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号