首页> 外文期刊>Policy sciences >Delphic oracles: ambiguity, institutions, and multiple streams
【24h】

Delphic oracles: ambiguity, institutions, and multiple streams

机译:Delphic甲骨文:模棱两可,机构多流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of the special issue is to explore a neglected aspect of the multiple streams approach (MSA): the impact of institutions in amending (or not) the framework's logic and hypotheses. The articles address this issue drawing on evidence from the Czech Republic, Germany, Norway, and the European Union. After discussing the origins and elements of multiple streams, I lay out the challenges posed by including institutions in MSA and introduce some of the ways the authors have attempted to overcome them. I argue the inclusion of institutions challenges and enriches but does not seriously amend the logic of MSA.
机译:特刊的目的是探索多流方法(MSA)的一个被忽略的方面:制度在修改(或不修改)框架的逻辑和假设方面的影响。文章利用捷克共和国,德国,挪威和欧洲联盟的证据解决了这个问题。在讨论了多个流的起源和要素之后,我提出了将机构纳入MSA所带来的挑战,并介绍了作者试图克服这些挑战的一些方法。我认为将机构纳入其中会带来挑战和丰富,但不会严重修改MSA的逻辑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号