首页> 外文期刊>Policing >Moral motives, police legitimacy and acceptance of force
【24h】

Moral motives, police legitimacy and acceptance of force

机译:道德动机,警察合法性和武力接受

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose This study extends legitimacy theory by examining individualizing and binding moral motives and perceptions of police. Design/methodology/approach Data are drawn from an online survey of the public (N = 961). OLS regression is used to predict global perceptions of legitimacy, as well as department legitimacy and acceptance of force in an experimental vignette that manipulates procedural justice. Findings The binding moral motive is associated with greater global and department legitimacy and acceptance of force. The individualizing moral motive is associated with reduced global legitimacy and acceptance of force, and with department legitimacy when procedural justice is low. Perceptions of legitimacy mediate the effects of the binding moral motive on acceptance of force and of the individualizing moral motive when procedural justice is low. Research limitations/implications This study identifies novel antecedents of police legitimacy and acceptance of force (i.e. binding and individualizing moral motives). Social implications This study provides insight into public attitudes regarding use of force. Originality/value This study is the first to propose and test a link between binding and individualizing moral motives and perceptions of police.
机译:目的本研究通过检查个性化和具有约束力的道德动机和警察的看法来扩展合法性理论。设计/方法/方法数据来自公众的在线调查(n = 961)。 OLS回归用于预测对合法性的全球知识,以及部门合法性和接受武力的实验小插图,可以操纵程序正义。调查结果具有约束力的道德动机与更大的全球和部门合法性和武力接受有关。个性化的道德动机与减少的全球​​合法性和武力接受有关,当程序正义低时,与部门合法性有关。对合法性的看法在程序正义低时调解了对武力的接受和个性化道德动机的影响。研究限制/含义本研究确定了警察合法性和接受力的新型前进者(即约束力和个性化道德动机)。社会含义本研究提供了对有关武力的公共态度的洞察力。本研究的原创性/价值是第一个提出和测试绑定和个性化道德动机和对警察的看法之间的联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号