首页> 外文期刊>Planning Perspectives >Taking path dependence seriously: an historical institutionalist research agenda in planning history
【24h】

Taking path dependence seriously: an historical institutionalist research agenda in planning history

机译:认真对待路径依赖:规划历史中的历史制度主义研究议程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper outlines an historical institutionalist (HI) research agenda for planning history. HI approaches to the understanding of institutions, path dependence, positive feedback effects in public policy, and patterned processes of institutional change offer a robust theoretical framework and a valuable set of conceptual and analytic tools for the analysis of continuity and change in public policy. Yet, to date, there has been no systematic effort to incorporate historical institutionalism into planning history research. The body of the paper proposes planning history relevant definitions of institutions, path dependence, critical junctures, and incremental change processes, outlines recent HI literature applying and extending these concepts, and frames a number of research questions for planning history that these approaches suggest. A concluding section explores the potential application and leverage of HI approaches to the study of planning history and international comparative planning studies and outlines a research agenda.
机译:本文概述了规划历史的历史制度主义者(HI)研究议程。 HI对制度的理解,路径依赖,公共政策中的积极反馈效应以及制度变迁的模式化过程,为分析公共政策的连续性和变化提供了强大的理论框架以及一套有价值的概念和分析工具。然而,迄今为止,还没有系统地努力将历史制度主义纳入规划历史研究。本文的主体提出了与机构,路径依赖,关键关口和增量变化过程相关的规划历史定义,概述了应用和扩展这些概念的最新HI文献,并提出了这些方法建议的规划历史方面的许多研究问题。结论部分探讨了HI方法在计划历史研究和国际比较计划研究中的潜在应用和优势,并概述了研究议程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号