首页> 外文期刊>Philosophia >Forgotten Victims of Military Humanitarian Intervention: A Case for the Principle of Reparation?
【24h】

Forgotten Victims of Military Humanitarian Intervention: A Case for the Principle of Reparation?

机译:被遗忘的军事人道主义干预的受害者:赔偿原则的一个例子?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this article is briefly to present a case for the principle of reparation as a new jus in bello principle for just humanitarian intervention. The article is divided into three sections. In “Restorative Justice and Civilian Protection”, I investigate the idea of restorative justice in order to consider whether or not it can complement the shortcomings of the just war tradition in civilian protection. In “The Legal Framework on Reparation: Its Scope and Limitations”, I examine the scope of the law of armed conflict on reparatory measures in order to consider whether and how ideas of and measures for restorative justice might be incorporated in the jus in bello framework for military humanitarian intervention. In “The Issue of Civilian Victims: A Case for Reparation”, I explore the implications of reparatory measures for victims in order to suggest that these measures are not only beneficial to civilian victims but also imperative to be taken by the interveners if they undertake military intervention within the jus in bello framework and claim its moral justifiability.
机译:本文的目的是简要介绍赔偿原则,将其作为公正的人道主义干预原则。本文分为三个部分。在“恢复性司法与平民保护”中,我研究了恢复性司法的概念,以考虑它是否可以弥补平民保护中正义战争传统的不足。在“赔偿法律框架:其范围和局限性”中,我研究了武装冲突法中关于赔偿措施的范围,以考虑是否可以以及如何将恢复性司法的思想和措施纳入反叛的法律框架中。用于军事人道主义干预。在“平民受害者的问题:赔偿案”中,我探讨了赔偿措施对受害者的影响,以表明这些措施不仅有益于平民受害者,而且如果干预者进行军事行动,他们必须采取这些措施。在战时利益冲突框架内进行干预,并主张其道义上的正当性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号