首页> 外文期刊>Philosophy & technology >Knowing How, Knowing That, Knowing Technology
【24h】

Knowing How, Knowing That, Knowing Technology

机译:知道如何,知道那样,知道技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A wide variety of skills, abilities and knowledge are used in technological activities such as engineering design. Together, they enable problem solving and artefact creation. Gilbert Ryle's division of knowledge into knowing how and knowing that is often referred to when discussing this technological knowledge. Ryle's view has been questioned and criticised by those who claim that there is only one type, for instance, Jason Stanley and Timothy Williamson who claim that knowing how is really a form of knowing that and Stephen Hetherington who claims that knowing that is knowing how. Neither Ryle himself nor any of his critics have discussed technological knowledge. Exposing both Ryle's and his critics' ideas to technological knowledge show that there are strong reasons to keep the knowing how-knowing that dichotomy in technological contexts. The main reasons are that they are justified in different ways, that Stanley's and Williamson's ideas have great difficulties to account for learning of technological knowing how through training, and that knowing that is susceptible to Gettier problems, which technological knowing how is not.
机译:在技​​术活动(例如工程设计)中使用了各种各样的技能,能力和知识。它们一起使问题解决和人工制品创建成为可能。吉尔伯特·赖尔(Gilbert Ryle)将知识分为知识和技术知识,这在讨论该技术知识时经常被提及。那些声称只有一种类型的人对Ryle的观点提出了质疑和批评,例如Jason Stanley和Timothy Williamson认为知道是一种真正的形式,而Stephen Hetherington声称知道这是一种形式。莱尔本人和他的任何评论家都没有讨论过技术知识。将莱尔及其批评家的思想都暴露给技术知识表明,有充分的理由让人们知道如何在技术环境中了解这种二分法。主要原因是,它们以不同的方式被证明是正确的,斯坦利和威廉姆森的思想很难解释如何通过培训来学习技术知识,而这种知识很容易受到Gettier问题的影响,而技术知识则不然。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号