首页> 外文期刊>Philosophical Explorations >Epistemic extendedness, testimony, and the epistemology of instrument-based belief
【24h】

Epistemic extendedness, testimony, and the epistemology of instrument-based belief

机译:认知扩展,证词和基于工具的信念的认识论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In Relying on others [Goldberg, S. 2010a. Relying on others: An essay in epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press], I argued that, from the perspective of an interest in epistemic assessment, the testimonial belief-forming process should be regarded as interpersonally extended. At the same time, I explicitly rejected the extendedness model for beliefs formed through reliance on a mere mechanism, such as a clock. In this paper, I try to bolster my defense of this asymmetric treatment. I argue that a crucial assumption lying behind the argument I used to establish interpersonal extendedness in testimony cases does not apply to beliefs formed through reliance on instruments. In this respect, at least, there appears to be something epistemically distinctive about relying on another epistemic agent.View full textDownload full textKeywordstestimony, instruments, epistemic norms, assertionRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2012.670719
机译:依靠他人[Goldberg,S. 2010a。依靠他人:认识论论文。牛津:牛津大学出版社],我认为,从对认知评估的兴趣的角度来看,应将证明信念形成过程视为人际扩展。同时,我明确拒绝了扩展性模型,因为这种扩展性模型是通过仅依靠诸如时钟之类的机制形成的信念。在本文中,我试图加强对这种不对称治疗的辩护。我认为,我在证词案件中用来确立人际关系扩展性的论点背后的一个关键假设不适用于通过依赖工具形成的信念。在这方面,至少在依赖另一个认知主体方面似乎在认识论上与众不同。查看全文下载全文关键词证词,工具,认知规范,断言,netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2012.670719

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号