首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives on science >Demarcating Fringe Science for Policy
【24h】

Demarcating Fringe Science for Policy

机译:标定边缘科学以制定政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Here we try to characterize the fringe of science as opposed to the mainstream. We want to do this in order to provide some theory of the difference that can be used by policy-makers and other decision-makers but without violating the principles of what has been called ‘Wave Two of Science Studies’. Therefore our demarcation criteria rest on differences in the forms of life of the two activities rather than questions of rationality or rightness; we try to show the ways in which the fringe differs from the mainstream in terms of the way they think about and practice the institution of science. Along the way we provide descriptions of fringe institutions and sciences and their outlets. We concentrate mostly on physics.
机译:在这里,我们试图描述与主流相对的科学边缘。我们这样做是为了提供一些差异理论,以供决策者和其他决策者使用,同时又不违反所谓的“波动性科学研究”的原则。因此,我们的分界标准基于两种活动的生活形式上的差异,而不是理性或正确性问题;我们试图说明这些条纹在思考和实践科学制度的方式上与主流有所不同。在此过程中,我们提供了对边缘机构和科学及其渠道的描述。我们主要专注于物理学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号