首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives in Biology and Medicine >THE RESEARCH IMPERATIVE REVISITED: considerations for advancing the debate surrounding medical research as moral imperative
【24h】

THE RESEARCH IMPERATIVE REVISITED: considerations for advancing the debate surrounding medical research as moral imperative

机译:修改研究命令:推进围绕医学研究作为道德命令的辩论的考虑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Medical research is frequently regarded as not only laudable, but even obligatory. However, the moral foundation for such an obligation is far from clear. Lively debate concerning the viability of an obligation to conduct and support medical research is transpiring among a small number of scholars speaking from a variety of backgrounds, yet the current discussion is predominantly situated within several discrete academic and professional circles, allowing only sporadic engagement within and between scholarly disciplines and the medical realm. We aim to lay the groundwork for a focused critique of the "research imperative" by examining (1) its commitments within ideologies of science, medicine, and progress: and (2) its normative theoretical underpinnings. Our analysis finds no solid grounding for the research imperative and exposes problems in the attitudes and arguments supporting it. We believe these concerns present compelling reasons for devoting greater critical attention to the research imperative and to the morality of the medical research enterprise as a whole. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:医学研究经常被认为不仅值得称赞,甚至是必须的。但是,这种义务的道德基础还很不清楚。来自不同背景的少数学者在进行有关开展和支持医学研究的义务的可行性方面的热烈辩论,然而当前的讨论主要集中在几个离散的学术界和专业界,仅允许零星的参与和参与。在学术学科和医学领域之间。我们旨在通过审查(1)科学,医学和进步意识形态内的承诺;以及(2)它的规范性理论基础,为针对“研究势在必行”的批评奠定基础。我们的分析没有为研究的必要性打下坚实的基础,并在支持它的态度和论据中暴露了问题。我们认为,这些担忧提出了令人信服的理由,需要将更多的批判注意力放在研究的当务之急和整个医学研究企业的道德上。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《Perspectives in Biology and Medicine》 |2010年第3期|p.373-387|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Katherine Wayne* and Kathleen Cranley Glass[dagger]*Department of Philosophy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario.[dagger]Biomedical Ethics Unit and the Departments of Human Genetics and Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal.Correspondence: KatherineWayne, Department of Philosophy, JohnWatson Hall, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.E-mail: katherine.wayne@queensu.ca.This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2008 Canadian Bioethics Society's annual conference, and the authors wish to thank the attending scholars and medical practitioners for their questions and comments.They also wish to thank Daniel Callahan for his encouragement and thoughtful comments, and the journal's reviewers for their detailed and challenging feedback. Finally, they wish to thank their colleagues and friends from McGill's Biomedical Ethics Unit, who have provided invaluable insight, feedback, and ongoing support.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:19:52

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号