首页> 外文期刊>Peabody Journal of Education >Exploring the Sensitivity of Education Costs to Racial Composition of Schools and Race-Neutral Alternative Measures: A Cost Function Application to Missouri
【24h】

Exploring the Sensitivity of Education Costs to Racial Composition of Schools and Race-Neutral Alternative Measures: A Cost Function Application to Missouri

机译:探索教育成本对学校种族组成和种族中立替代措施的敏感性:成本函数在密苏里州的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article applies the education cost function methodology in order to estimate additional costs associated with black student concentration and with alternative, race-neutral measures of urban poverty. Recent research highlights the continued importance of the role of race in educational outcomes, and how the intersection of peer group effects and teacher-quality distribution serve to simultaneously disadvantage black children attending racially-isolated black schools (Clotfelter, C., Ladd, H., Vigdor, J., 2006; Hanushek and Rivkin, 2007). But some questions persist as to whether race, in-and-of-itself should be considered a relevant factor influencing the costs of providing equal educational opportunity. I replicate cost models originally introduced in the context of school funding litigation in 2006, using data from the state of Missouri from 2001 to 2005, and then estimate updated cost models based on data from 2006 to 2008, including indicators of school district racial composition and also including race-neutral indicators of urban, concentrated poverty. I find substantive differences in the cost model predictions when race variables are included in the model, as opposed to race-neutral alternatives, identifying higher costs to achieve state average outcomes in districts where the majority of enrolled students are Black, all else equal. But, conflicting evidence from the race-sensitive versus race-neutral models, including varied prediction accuracy for individual districts makes it difficult to choose which measures better approximate the true cost drivers of Missouri public schools.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2011.539957
机译:本文采用教育成本函数方法来估计与黑人学生集中度以及与城市贫困的替代性种族中立措施相关的额外成本。最近的研究凸显了种族在教育成果中的作用的持续重要性,以及同伴群体效应和教师素质分布的相交如何同时使处于种族隔离的黑人学校的黑人孩子处于不利地位(Clotfelter,C.,Ladd,H. ,Vigdor,J.,2006; Hanushek和Rivkin,2007)。但是,关于种族,自身内部是否应被视为影响提供平等教育机会成本的相关因素,仍然存在一些问题。我使用密苏里州2001年至2005年的数据,复制了2006年在学校资助诉讼中最初引入的成本模型,然后根据2006年至2008年的数据估算了更新的成本模型,其中包括学区种族构成指标和还包括城市种族集中贫困的种族中立指标。当种族变量包含在模型中时,我发现成本模型预测存在实质性差异,这与种族中立替代方案不同,后者确定了更高的成本,以在大多数在校学生都是黑人的地区实现州平均结果。但是,来自种族敏感模型和种族中立模型的证据相互矛盾,包括各个地区的预测准确性不同,因此很难选择哪种方法更接近密苏里州公立学校的真实成本驱动因素。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand :“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2011.539957

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号