首页> 外文期刊>Pattern recognition letters >Assessing similarity in handwritten texts
【24h】

Assessing similarity in handwritten texts

机译:评估手写文本中的相似性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Today, people rely almost full time on digital texts. It is not surprising that handwriting earned a special status, and solutions to mimic real handwriting became attractive. A particular field called handwriting synthesis generates renderings of text which resemble natural writing but are synthesized from actual handwriting samples. The main idea behind samples' current solutions is to collect enough samples to capture a given subject's writing style, and therefore be able to reproduce it in new texts, with natural variability. Nevertheless, the question remains of how much input variability is enough to represent specific handwriting. In this paper, we address sample acquisition for handwriting synthesis. We conducted a study comparing written text similarity between two sets of samples, one using augmented pangrams (with a total of 473 characters) and the other using general texts (with 1586 characters). Our results show that the samples collected with pangrams are statistically equivalent in variation with samples collected using general texts, with many benefits, particularly the shorter time needed to collect the samples. We also made our data collection publicly available, providing a valuable original resource for future research. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:今天,人们几乎依靠数字文本全职。手写赢得了特殊状态并解决了模仿实际手写的解决方案并不令人惊讶。称为手写合成的特定字段生成类似于自然写入的文本的渲染,而是从实际手写样本中合成。样品背后的主要思想当前解决方案是收集足够的样品以捕获给定的主题的书写风格,因此能够以自然可变性在新文本中重现它。尽管如此,问题仍然有多少输入变异性足以表示特定的笔迹。在本文中,我们处理样品采集以进行笔迹合成。我们进行了一项研究比较了两组样本之间的书面文本相似性,其中一个使用增强的Pangrams(总共473个字符),另一组使用常规文本(1586个字符)。我们的研究结果表明,用Pangrams收集的样本在统计上等同于使用一般文本收集的样品,具有许多益处,特别是收集样品所需的时间较短。我们还将我们的数据收集公开提供,为未来的研究提供有价值的原始资源。 (c)2020 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号